2018 Jaguar E-Pace First Drive - Athletic, Not Electric

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Jaguar claims the F-Pace, its first crossover SUV, more or less doubled the automaker’s sales almost overnight. That little factoid makes a statement about the state of the automotive industry – namely, that crossovers are hot and that just about every brand needs to sell one to survive, regardless of a brand’s history.

Just ask Porsche. If not for the Cayenne (and now the Macan), could that company continue to afford to build the venerable 911, as well as the Boxster and Cayman?

The answer, of course, is probably not. That’s a big part of the reason why even “exotic” brands such as Bentley and Lamborghini have gotten into, or are getting into, the SUV game.

Certainly, Jaguar has picked up on the trend. Following the F-Pace comes the smaller E-Pace, and soon to follow is the I-Pace, complete with an all-electric powertrain. It may still seem weird to many of us that Jaguar is building and selling crossovers, but we’re also living in an era in which former Jaguar owner Ford offers a turbocharged four in the Mustang (as something other than a weak “base” powerplant) and Mitsubishi is planning on using the Eclipse name on a crossover. Things change, man.

Consider that Jaguar’s sales saw a 124-percent increase (thanks, former TTAC’er Tim Cain) in the six months after the F-Pace launched, compared to the six months previous to the launch. The XE played a part, sure, but the F-Pace did wonders for Jaguar. So it’s only natural that other crossovers would follow.

Full disclosure: Jaguar paid for my flights (in business class) all the way to and from Corsica, France (!), as well as my hotels and meals, so that I could drive the all-new E-Pace. Also, I may or may not have gotten caught speeding by a speed camera (it’s unclear), and I have promised Jaguar I will pay the fine if I was indeed caught over the limit. Jaguar left us two books about the E-Pace and Corsica, which I was going to leave behind until I realized both may contain information that would be relevant to this review. Jaguar also helped me with my video stand-up for TTAC’s YouTube page.

Odd nomenclature aside (why is the E-Pace NOT the electric one?), the E-Pace rides on a different platform than the larger F-Pace, and Jaguar considers its competitive set to include the BMW X2 and X3, the Audi Q3, the Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class, and perhaps the Lexus NX and Infiniti QX50. Jaguar didn’t mention the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, but that also seems like a natural competitor.

Before diving into this, I have to say I went in fighting a bit of bias. Not pro-Jag, but the opposite. I knew that if I liked the E-Pace, you out there in Best and Brightest land might just accuse me of being bought off by a trip to Corsica. I tried to keep an open mind, and well, what do you know, I mostly liked it. That had nothing to do with France – it’s just a well-done sporty compact luxury crossover.

Despite riding on a completely different platform than the F-Pace and having its own unique styling cues, the family resemblance is clear. At a distance, the E-Pace looks like a truncated F-Pace. This is both good and bad – I like the overall look of the F-Pace, so I am glad the E-Pace has similar styling, but the larger F-Pace looks better proportioned – the E-Pace looks a little chopped from some angles.

Chopped it may be, but from other angles, the E looks sporty – it just depends where you’re standing. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder in relation to the car, goes this version of the old quote I just made up.

Inside our tester, which spec’d out as an equivalent to a R-Dynamic in HSE trim (more on that below), an available large infotainment screen dominates the top half of the center stack, while the bottom accounts for the necessary buttons and serves as home to three large HVAC knobs. Push the digital readout in the middle to operate the heated and cooled seats – it’s a neat trick that saves space but adds steps to operating a simple function. There is a radio volume knob, but it’s small and oriented nearest the passenger for some inexplicable reason. I am no interior designer, but it looks like Jag could’ve not only placed the knob nearest the driver, but there even appears to be room for a tuning knob. The lack of passenger grab handles also struck me as odd.

At least the infotainment screen is easy to read, thanks to clear graphics, and it’s intuitive enough. Our pre-production tester did run into a minor issue with displaying the correct music information when using the harddrive to play tunes.

The digital gauges are easy to read, as is the available head-up display, and while the cacophony of buttons on the steering wheel looks intimidating, they’re simple enough to use while motoring.

Perhaps unsurprisingly for a vehicle of this size, rear-seat space is tight. If you plan on double-dating much, you might want to shop a size up.

Euros get all the fun, at least when it comes to E-Pace choice. Us ‘Muricans get only two engine choices – both four-bangers of the turbocharged variety, and we don’t get front-wheel drive. We do get two types of all-wheel drive – one which shifts torque to the rear axle on demand, and another that handles the torque distribution duties a little differently. Essentially, the standard AWD system is constantly shifting torque front and rear as conditions dictate, while the optional system – called Active Driveline – switches to front-drive when cruising in order to reduce parasitic losses via the driveline. It can quickly switch back to AWD should the conditions warrant it. One-hundred percent of that torque can go to either rear wheel, as necessary.

On the road, this means that if you overcook a corner and start to experience understeer, you can feel the rear kick around a bit to guide you through. Not that, uh, I found out by underestimating a few corners and coming in a tad too hot, or anything like that. No, nope, not at all.

Joking aside, the E-Pace is a solid corner-carver, at least as solid as any luxury compact crossover can be, especially in dynamic mode (which quickens the steering without firming up feel). Engaging and fun to drive, at least by crossover standards, it felt at home in the mountains.

Ride-wise, the E-Pace is stiffly sprung, which Jaguar PR told me was the idea – Jaguar vehicles will usually be tuned stiffer than their Land Rover brethren. This stiffness was felt on the pot-holed, two-lane roads of Corisca but there was no chance for freeway driving – I am not even sure if there is a freeway in Corsica.

The top-end 2.0-liter turbo four (296 horsepower, 295 lb-ft of torque) provided solid punch, but it took a second for the nine-speed automatic transmission to kick down. That transmission was otherwise seen and not heard during cruise, but the wonky shifter frustrates during parking maneuvers. You think you’re in gear when you’re actually in neutral. I prefer JLR’s circular shifter, but that’s just me.

Also, for some odd reason, the turbo four sounded like a diesel at times.

I can’t write a fair comparison of the E-Pace to most of its competitive set, at least not yet, as I’ve not driven most of the competing crossovers. I’ve only driven the Stelvio (in Ti trim), the QX50, and the NX – and I didn’t get the chance to drive the Stelvio hard on curvy roads. As for the NX, I drove it so long ago that the 2016 presidential election wasn’t yet on the cultural radar.

The E-Pace does outhandle the QX50 (which isn’t as stiffly sprung), which I thought was capable in its own right. Then again, the E-Pace is more focused on being sporty than the QX.

The E-Pace is a sporty little thing, but comfort and convenience matter much in this segment. Like other compact luxury crossovers, the E-Pace starts at a reasonable price but ticking option selections will run up the bill quickly.

You can build an E-Pace one of two ways – package it together by trim level or shop a la carte, piling options on individually. The latter will cost you more, but if you want an HSE trim vehicle without actually selecting HSE, you can do that.

As it stands now, you can select an E-Pace with the base 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (246 horsepower) or an R-Dynamic with the more-powerful four. The R-Dynamic adds chrome exterior trim and has different bumpers and a black gloss grille finish. A this-year-only First Edition model comes with the base engine, standard panoramic sunroof and head-up display, 20-inch wheels, and exclusive trim bits.

If you don’t pick the R-Dynamic, you can choose from base, S, and SE trims, while the R-Dynamic is available as S, SE, and HSE. Available wheel sizes include 17-, 18-, 19-, and 20-inches. Available features include powered tailgate (with gesture control available), panoramic sunroof, head-up display, navigation, premium audio, USB, Bluetooth, rear-view camera, lane-keep assist, emergency braking, heated front seats, cooled front seats, heated rear seats, 4G in-car Wi-Fi hotspot, Jaguar activity key, front and rear parking aid, and driver-condition monitor.

It’s hard to directly compare the Euro-spec cars we drove to U.S. specs, but the vehicle I drove for a day and a half would set you back approximately $58,210, including the $995 destination fee. It was optioned out similar to a loaded HSE, with a pre-option price of $47,250. That $58K price tag puts it close to a loaded QX50, by way of comparison.

Those options were the 12.3-inch interactive display ($565), 18-way electric heated and cooled memory front seats with heated rear seats ($1,330), standard Wi-Fi, activity key ($410), powered gesture tailgate ($460, plus $565 for the keyless entry system you need first), panoramic sunroof ($1,225), head-up display ($970), “drive pack” driver’s assistance package (blind-spot monitoring, adaptive cruise control, $970), red brake calipers ($410), black exterior package ($220), metallic paint ($590), and 20-inch wheels ($2,250).

So even if we’re approximating, you have about a $20,000 difference between the base E-Pace ($38,600, before $995 D and D fee) and a top-of-the-walk HSE. The base model doesn’t lack for content – it has some of the key driver’s assistance equipment (such as lane-keep assist), for example, along with rear fog lights, LED headlights, leather steering wheel, push-button start, and dual-zone climate control.

Altogether, the E-Pace is in athletic compact luxury crossover that sacrifices some ride comfort for the sake of sport. It’s handsome in and out, but quirky design decisions mar an otherwise well-done interior. Rear-seat space is limited, too.

Athletic but requires some sacrifice, may be expensive, and posseses a few quirks. As any cat owner will tell you, those are feline traits to a T.

[Images © 2018 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Mcbacon Mcbacon on Feb 22, 2018

    I actually like the way this looks. It almost reminds me of my beloved 1st gen FX in visual proportions. I'd love a diesel in this thing.

  • Wunsch Wunsch on Feb 22, 2018

    The volume knob on the passenger side actually makes complete sense. The driver has controls on the steering wheel. The knob is just there for the passenger, so why not make it easy to reach?

  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
Next