Report: Tesla Set for Layoffs

by Chris Teague

Published: April 15th, 2024

Things are getting a little bumpy at Tesla. The automaker’s first-quarter delivery numbers raised eyebrows, undercutting even the most critical expectations by a notable margin. Now, rumors are swirling about Tesla’s employee base, with some telling Electrek that the automaker plans to cut as much as 10 percent of its workforce in what would amount to thousands of layoffs.

Tesla had already riled workers with slow performance reviews, and many didn’t appreciate the automaker’s decision to raise prices earlier this year. It also appears to have nixed plans for an affordable entry-level EV in favor of a broad robotaxi initiative, which hasn’t sat well with many inside the company and out.

While Tesla hasn’t been shy about layoffs in the past, they were generally due to overhiring and shedding workers who were not up to the cut. This round comes at a turbulent time for the automaker, which could indicate a disease at the top levels of the company, with slow sales and other factors.

The situation isn’t much better with Tesla’s existing vehicles. People are reporting significant problems with brand-new deliveries, such as pedals falling off the Cybertruck (this could become a bigger story over time), and the company recently had a massive number of excess vehicles in its inventory.

Of course, EV growing pains aren’t unique to Tesla. The whole industry is grappling with sliding demand and high prices, as many have backtracked to develop new hybrids and plug-in hybrids to fill the gap. That said, Tesla doesn’t have that option, making things uniquely precarious for the once rapidly-growing American automaker.

[Image: Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Tesla #ElonMusk

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

5 of 22 comments

3SpeedAutomatic on Apr 15, 2024
Curious, what gives Elon most of his wealth?? Is it:
- Tesla
- the space company,
- "X" (formerly known as Twitter),
- the boring company,
- money left over from PayPal
- something else
I suspect it's Tesla. Yet, Elon has not been minding the EV company as much as he needs to. EV's are moving from "early adapter" stage to "commodity" status. All of Detroit, the Nippon brands (sans Toyota), and the Koreans are jumping on the bandwagon in earnest. Lordstown is out, Rivian is struggling, Mustang Mach E's are sitting on dealer lots, not sure about Lucid Air (not to be confused with the Cadillac Lyriq), and the rest are holding their breath. Is this Malaise 2.0 due to expiring tax credits, nebulous mileage quotes, the hassle of charging, and/or media publicity concerning burning cars??
Just wait till BYD hits town. Ouch!!!!! 🚗🚗🚗
2 Reply
- See 1 previous
- Pig_Iron on Apr 15, 2024
  
  I would be very surprised if it's Xitter. Particularly because he violates the try before you buy standard there. ✖
  
  Like
- Bd2 on Apr 15, 2024
  
  Toyota is jumping into BEVs in a pretty big way as well (albeit a little slower than others), currently building a new BEV and battery plants in NA.
  
  Like
Jpolicke on Apr 15, 2024

I wonder where the layoffs are coming from. Can’t be from QC, nobody works there.

3 Reply
- EBFlex on Apr 16, 2024
  
  Or engineering.
  
  1

Recent Comments

Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?