Struggling Fisker Could Get a $400 Million Lifeline from Nissan

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Things looked promising for Fisker at first, and the automaker actually delivered on its promise to design and manufacture a new EV. Even so, the automotive market is brutal and unforgiving, and Fisker’s fortunes have turned as it has had an uphill battle getting its new Ocean SUV out the door. The company recently announced a layoff of 15 percent of its workforce and said it would pause investments until it could find a new partner.


It now appears that help could come from Nissan, who, according to Reuters, might be close to investing $400 million into the struggling EV maker.


Sources told the publication that Nissan’s investment would give it access to Fisker’s EV technologies, including its platform engineering and technology. In turn, Nissan would build Fisker’s already-announced Alaska electric pickup truck. The automaker would also build a Nissan-branded pickup on the same platform.


Fisker has always been chasing manufacturing partners, eventually landing on Magna to build the Ocean. While its technology would certainly help Nissan – which has been slow on the draw with EVs and has had its ups and downs, with the Ariya EV seeing a significant delay.


This deal could be the lifeline Fisker needs to pull through the storm, but it doesn’t bode well for other upstart electric automakers. The complexities and extreme costs involved with spinning up a new auto brand and models are hurdles to cross, but companies then have to contend with wavering demand in the United States, which may take other new automakers down a few pegs if things don’t pick up this year.


[Image: Fisker]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 25 comments
  • Analoggrotto Analoggrotto on Mar 05, 2024

    NIssan used to be a great brand with a similar reputation to Honda or Toyota - better at times with specific products. Now and with much thanks to outlets such as TTAC they are beneath Hyundai, Kia or Genesis.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 05, 2024

      You can't stand outside the barn in your lululemon and try to make serious comments. If you have a contribution to make, you need to join us and get comfortable.



  • VoGhost VoGhost on Mar 05, 2024

    But who will save Nissan?

    • See 1 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Mar 05, 2024

      My reasoning: You know everything and you never listen to anyone, therefore your parents must have been incredibly knowledgeable, the kind of people in demand at any automaker.

  • SCE to AUX Introduce a modern V-16 and put it into a Celestiq-like vehicle instead of electric.
  • DungBeetle62 For where we're at in the product cycle, I think there are bigger changes afoot. With this generation debuting in 2018, and the Avalon gone, is the next ES to be Crown based? That'll be an interesting aesthetic leap.
  • Philip Precht When Cadillac stopped building luxury cars, with luxury looks, that is when they started their downward spiral. Now, they just look like Chevrolet knock-offs, not much luxury, no luxurious looks. Interiors are just generic. Nothing what they used to look like. Why should someone spend $80,000 on a Cadillac when they can spend a LOT less and get a comparable looking Chevrolet????
  • Ajla A time machine.
  • 28-Cars-Later This question has been posed many times and we discussed it in depth around the time of the ATS and JdN. Then GM had 933 dealers left over from its glory days and ATS was intended to be volume lease fodder for all of those dealer customers. But of course the problem there is channel stuffed junk worked against the image they ostensibly were trying to create when they threatened products like Escala (and the image they thought they were creating with ELR). Cadillac had two choices in my view at the time, either drop 2/3rds of the dealers and focus on truly bespoke low volume product or abandon the pretense of exclusive/bespoke and build high volume models as they had essentially been doing since the last 1960s. Ten years on the choice they made was obvious, hence XT everything... XT an acronym for Xerox This when pointing at Chevrolets and Buicks.There's no "saving" a marque which doesn't wish to be saved. In the next major financial crisis Buick may be folded or consolidated into Chevrolet but Cadiwrack will just become a wrapper over whatever Chinesium infused junk the new openly owner/controlled SAIC GM wants it to be. Cadillac been gone for a long, long time.
Next