Honda Thinks Sensing Updates Will Halve Fatal Car Accidents By 2030

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Honda is chanting the mantra in which the automotive industry magically delivers “a collision-free society” by leveraging the latest technology. Though this is hardly a novel marketing strategy, even for Honda, and one that predictably requires you to be patient because the company says it won’t be arriving as standard equipment until 2030.


Automakers have been promising that advanced driving aids would eventually result in hazard-free motoring since the 1950s. However, that kind of talk became ubiquitous around 2015 when manufacturers started promising that autonomous cars would soon eliminate crashes while battery-powered vehicles saved the environment. You’ve heard every brand say so a million times before, often issuing an itemized plan with deadlines that are never met.


Still, progress is eventually made. It just tends to happen at a much slower pace than promised and in a manner that automakers can use to financially rationalize their massive development budgets.


Honda Sensing has been embedded into its products since 2014, offering an array of convenience and safety features the entire industry has been chasing. Over the years, we’ve seen the manufacturer add things like lane-keeping, adaptive cruise control, and automated emergency braking. But Honda says it’s about to add “hands-free driving” with an updated version of the Sensing suite just a few years away.


Well, it’ll be a few years away before North Americans get access. The updated version will actually be debuting in China this year under the banner of Honda Sensing 360 and Sensing Elite. But the company has announced that they’ll begin making their way to the U.S. market in the second half of this decade. So you should start seeing all the glitzy hands-free stuff by 2025 with Honda planning to make it standard by 2030.


As for what you’re actually getting, the name kind of gives it away. Whereas the original Sensing system relied on a single camera and frontal sensor array, the new version will add 5 millimeter-wave sensors (basically a horizontal radar system) that provide 360 degrees of coverage. This is supposed to make the current roster of advanced driving aids more reliable and capable.


Honda claimed that the update would "further reduce driver burden by detecting abnormal conditions occurring to the driver and the vehicle’s surroundings and reducing the risk of collisions." While it didn’t really specify what that meant, it sounds like there will be some form of driver monitoring, which presumably means in-cabin cameras.


If you’re wondering why China gets first dibs, there are a few possibilities. Honda either believes that China has surpassed the United States as an economic superpower and will simply have more people willing to spend extra money on these kinds of features or it doesn’t think the system will pass regulatory muster in the U.S. without there being some changes made to vehicle safety standards – something that’s currently taking place.


There’s also the possibility that Honda is worried about consumer acceptance in North America. Despite the entire industry pushing screen-focused infotainment systems, hands-free driving tech, and assistance features that are supposed to make for safer trips, the feedback the industry is getting on some of the above has grown mixed in the United States. Studies have suggested that advanced driving aids aren’t all that effective and may do more harm than good by gradually dulling the driver’s skills while button-free interiors have proven themselves more taxing than tranquil. The prospect of implementing driver-monitoring cameras has also been wildly unpopular with Americans and it looks like Sensing 360 might include it.


By focusing so much energy on the above, automakers have alienated themselves from a subset of buyers that are more concerned with the fundamentals than how closely their automobile mimics the capabilities of their smartphone. But they’re also in competition with each other and know that there are just as many shoppers who will be swayed by the size of the screen that’s been installed into the dashboard. Nobody wants to be accused of being a backward-looking brand, even if the future seems superficial and shortsighted. Meanwhile, governments are starting to require advanced driving aids and driver monitoring systems as a safety precaution – often at the behest of automotive lobbyists.


From the sound of things, it looks like Honda wants to modernize its advanced driving system to be more competitive with other brands that have leaned more heavily into the technology. But you still won’t be getting a self-driving car.


The “Advanced In Lane Driving with Hands-Off Function” seems to be Honda Sensing 360's coolest feature. It’s basically hands-free cruise control with the ability to take corners (think Tesla Autopilot). However, it allegedly won’t require you to retake the wheel unless the car decides it cannot navigate the road ahead. If you fail to do that, the car then goes mental (honking and flashing lights) to alert the people around you that you’re unresponsive and about to crash while it does its best to avoid hitting anybody. Emergency Steering Support Technology is technically supposed to bring the car to a stop as safely as possible. But when everything goes sideways at 70 mph, that’s often easier said than done.


There will also be technology migrating over from Acura products, the most interesting being the exit warning feature that’s supposed to alert occupants of nearby (or oncoming) pedestrians or vehicles you may not notice are approaching. Though the really slick stuff will be exclusive to Sensing Elite, which Honda said was poised to receive “technologies to assist the driver on non-expressways including a hands-off function while driving through a traffic jam on arterial roads; to enable hands-off functions during merging onto and exiting from an expressway at a road junction; to assist the driver by automatically parking in and driving out of a home garage.”


Again, these are things we’ve seen other manufacturers show off in the past. But they’re not features you’d typically associate with Honda products. Regardless, the manufacturer is making some pretty big claims for the system and it would be impressive to see a successful execution – even if it’s accompanied by unsavory driver monitoring and more warning chimes than anyone should have to deal with.


The current version of Honda Sensing is standard on all new Hondas and Acuras sold in North America. Honda Sensing 360 and the related AcuraWatch will begin offering hands-free features in China immediately with the plan for it to become standard equipment globally by 2030 (supposedly reducing traffic fatalities in Honda products by half). But Sensing Elite doesn’t appear to have a formal timeline, not that we’d have expected the automaker to adhere to anything.


[Image: KULLAPONG PARCHERAT/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • Steve Biro Steve Biro on Nov 30, 2022

    Not only do I not want this technology in any vehicle that I own, I will not have it. As in I will never buy it or, if forced by circumstances to accept its presence, I will find a way to disarm it.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Dec 01, 2022

    "Though the really slick stuff will be exclusive to Sensing Elite"

    Why does Honda hate poor people?

    • Dick Johnson Dick Johnson on Dec 01, 2022

      Their shareholders love profit more than poor people like every other car maker!


  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
  • Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
  • Ollicat I am only speaking from my own perspective so no need to bash me if you disagree. I already know half or more of you will disagree with me. But I think the traditional upscale Cadillac buyer has traditionally been more conservative in their political position. My suggestion is to make Cadillac separate from GM and make them into a COMPANY, not just cars. And made the company different from all other car companies by promoting conservative causes and messaging. They need to build up a whole aura about the company and appeal to a large group of people that are really kind of sick of the left and sending their money that direction. But yes, I also agree about many of your suggestions above about the cars too. No EVs. But at this point, what has Cadillac got to lose by separating from GM completely and appealing to people with money who want to show everyone that they aren't buying the leftist Kook-Aid.
  • Jkross22 Cadillac's brand is damaged for the mass market. Why would someone pay top dollar for what they know is a tarted up Chevy? That's how non-car people see this.
Next