2021 Subaru Crosstrek Limited Review - New Engine, Fresh Face, Familiar Utility

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2021 Subaru Crosstrek Limited Fast Facts

2.5-liter horizontally-opposed "boxer" four-cylinder (182 horsepower @ 5,800 rpm; 176 lb-ft @ 4,400 rpm)
Continuously-variable automatic with eight-speed manual mode; all-wheel drive
27 city / 34 highway / 29 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
8.8 city, 7.0 highway, 8.0 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$27,995 (U.S) / $34,495 (Canada)
As Tested
$31,400 (U.S.) / $36,674 (Canada)
Prices include $1,050 destination charge in the United States and $1,900 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

The 2021 Subaru Crosstrek isn’t changed much, and that’s almost certainly a good thing for Subie.

After all, the Crosstrek, like other Subaru products, is popular with the brand faithful because of its utility abilities. So it behooves Subaru not to screw with it too much.

That said, no automaker wants to hear that a vehicle is getting long in the tooth while working on the next-gen version, so as often happens, the Crosstrek gets a refresh. In this case, the nip and tuck mostly involve the front grille and bumper.

A new Sport trim joins the lineup, and that model gets a new 2.5-liter “boxer” horizontally-opposed four-cylinder that makes 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. So, too, does the Limited model that’s tested here. Finally, models that have Subaru’s EyeSight driver-aid tech standard – in other words, models equipped with a continuously-variable automatic transmission – add adaptive cruise control with lane centering.

The visual changes are mild, so even with a new engine underhood, the overall package feels familiar. And looks familiar, of course, despite the mild changes.

Inside, I did find the larger infotainment screen an improvement over what Subaru has previously had on offer, while the rest of the cabin is functional in nature if a bit boring. Your neighbor won’t have his socks knocked off by the design, but you’ll find it easy to use.

With less than 200 lb-ft of torque on tap and a CVT (with eight-speed manual-shift mode) getting that power to ground, plus the added weight of a standard all-wheel-drive system, you’d expect the Crosstrek to be less than swift, and you’d be correct. Acceleration is merely adequate for most commuting duty.

Nor is the Crosstrek particularly engaging to drive, though its ride is acceptably compliant. However, it can be a tad noisy on the freeway. The steering feels ponderously heavy.

Not that most Crosstrek buyers care. Like the Outback or Forester, the Crosstrek’s appeal has little to do with driving dynamics. It’s all about utility and safety here. While I was unable to test its utility beyond stuffing a suitcase in the back for a road trip – I just don’t have a kayak sitting around – it does seem, at least on paper, to be able to get your bike/canoe/tent whatever to the trailhead just fine.

Value plays a part in the equation, too – this top-trim Limited rang the register at $31K. That’s not bad for a wagon-like vehicle that has a modicum of off-pavement ability to go along with safety and utility as well as decent fuel-economy numbers.

Standard or available features of note include dual front USB, Bluetooth, automatic climate control, keyless entry, roof rails, 18-inch wheels, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, satellite radio, blind-spot detection with lane-change assist and rear cross-traffic alert, dual rear USB, LED headlights, high-beam assist, keyless entry and starting, LED fog lamps, navigation, moonroof, Harman Kardon audio, and leather-trimmed seats.

Subaru’s core lineup is focused on safety and utility. Knockout design takes a backseat, and while the brand can and does do performance very well – see the BRZ or WRX/WRX STi – that aspect is relegated to dedicated vehicles.

Subie is happy – and successful – by focusing on the well-packaged vehicle that won’t set hearts racing but will make buyers feel their money was well spent. In that regard, the Crosstrek remains as familiar as ever.

[Images © 2021 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 24 comments
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next