Drive Notes: 2024 BMW i5 M60 xDrive

by Tim Healey

Published: April 1st, 2024

I tested a 2024 BMW i5 M60 xDrive last week, and I have thoughts.

Hit the jump for more.

The all-electric i5 is not cheap, starting at $84,100 and checking out at $93,495 as-tested. It's luxurious, fast, and has a distressingly low range. Read on.

Pros

It's quick. Yes, yes, most EVs feel quick thanks to instant torque. But this one has 593 horsepower and 586 lb-ft of torque and you feel it when you need to pass or merge.
The "Iconic Sounds" system seems to provide both a fake-exhaust sound and some sort of spaceship-like sounds, depending on drive mode, when you tromp hard on the accelerator. We've mostly been skeptical of this sort of thing here at TTAC, but it actually sounded kind of cool.
I like the boost paddle that gives you a bit more oomph for a few seconds.
BMW got the ride/handling mix right on this one.
The large infotainment screen extending out from the instrument cluster looks good.
Interior comfort is nice and the materials are price appropriate.
Highway cruising is quite comfy.

Cons

The range was only about 150 miles at 78 percent of capacity when I picked the car up, and charging on an old-school outlet is slooooow. I didn't have the chance to fast charge.
The shifter has no "Park" function, you either shut the system down or set the parking brake. This is annoying and I nearly had the car roll on me a couple of times.
Similarly, sometimes I shut the system off, but the radio was still playing, at least until I locked the doors. I've seen this on other Bimmers, and it remains confusing.
I couldn't figure out the name for the voice assistant, and clicking on it via the infotainment system and asking for its name went nowhere.
There's no front trunk, and therefore, no corresponding increase in storage space.
The price feels $20K too high.

We'll be back later this week with some scattered thoughts on the new Nissan Versa.

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#BMW #BmwI5 #2024BMWi5 #CarReviews #Newcars #DriveNotes

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 34 comments

MaintenanceCosts on Apr 02, 2024

The iX is a styling disaster, but this one is tolerable to me. But at this size and price, I'd rather go taller and have a CUV. It's not like a three-ton sedan is going to have much of a driving quality advantage.

1 Reply
Dana on Apr 13, 2024

You don’t need park, you set auto hold (button on the console). Every BMW answers to ‘Hey, BMW’, but you can set your own personal wake word in iDrive. It takes less than 5 minutes to figure that that out, btw. The audio stays on which is handy for Teams meetings. Once your phone is out of range, the audio is stopped on the car. You can always press down on the audio volume wheel which will mute it, if it bothers you. I found all the controls very intuitive.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Lorenzo This car would have sold better if there was a kit to put fiberglass toast slices on the roof.
Lorenzo The Malibu is close to what the 1955 Bel Air was, but 6 inches shorter in height, and 3 inches shorter in wheelbase, the former making it much more difficult to get into or out of. Grandma has to sit in front (groan) and she'll still have trouble getting in and out.The '55s had long options lists, but didn't include a 91 cubic inch four with a turbo, or a continuously variable transmission. Metal and decent fabric were replaced by cheap plastic too. The 1955 price was $1765 base, or $20,600 adjusted for inflation, but could be optioned up to $3,000 +/-, or $36,000, so in the same ballpark.The fuel economy, handling, and reliability are improved, but that's about it. Other than the fact that it means one fewer sedan available, there's no reason to be sorry it's being discontinued. Put the 1955 body on it and it'll sell like hotcakes, though.
Calrson Fan We are already seeing multiple manufacturers steering away from EVs to Hybrids & PHEVs. Suspect the market will follow. Battery tech isn't anywhere close to where it needs to be for EV's to replace ICE's. Neither is the electrical grid or charging infrastructure. PHEV's still have the drawback that if you can't charge at home your not a potential customer. I've heard stories of people with Volts that never charge them but that's a unique kind of stupidity. If you can't or don't want to charge your PHEV then just get a hybrid.
AZFelix The last time I missed the Malibu was when one swerved into my lane and I had to brake hard to avoid a collision. 1 out of 5⭐️. Do not recommend.
2ACL I won't miss it; it was decent at launch, but in addition to the bad packaging, GM did little to keep it relevant in the segment. I'd prefer that another domestic automaker doesn't just give up on the mainstream sedan, but unlike some of Ford's swan songs, the Malibu made an indifferent case for why they should live.