The Man Who Saved the Porsche 911 From Oblivion Has Died

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

It’s kind of difficult to imagine if you aren’t old enough to remember, but there was a period in the 1980s when the Porsche 911 was almost removed from the automotive landscape. In 1979, Porsche had made plans to replace the 911 with the new 928. The working logic was that the 911 was too quirky, impractical, and a bit of a handful. Porsche executives figured it just made good sense to swap it with something that had a broader appeal, especially as the company’s finances weren’t looking particularly robust at the time.

However, in 1981, Porsche AG found itself with a new chief executive — a German-born American named Peter Schutz. And he was having absolutely none of that nonsense.

“The decision to keep the 911 in the product line occurred one afternoon in the office of Dr. Helmuth Bott, the Porsche operating board member responsible for all engineering and development,” Schutz said in Tony Corlett’s Porsche 911 3.2 Carrera: The Last of the Evolution.

“I noticed a chart on the wall of Professor Bott’s office. It depicted the ongoing development schedules for the three primary Porsche product lines: 944, 928 and 911. Two of them stretched far into the future, but the 911 program stopped at the end of 1981. I remember rising from my chair, walking over to the chart, taking a black marker pen, and extending the 911 program bar clean off the chart. I am sure I heard a silent cheer from Professor Bott, and I knew I had done the right thing. The Porsche 911, the company icon, had been saved, and I believe the company was saved with it.”

Other accounts of that meeting are far more confrontational, but the point is that the decision to keep the 911 essentially came down to one man’s gut reaction. Schutz said he was keenly aware that employee morale was exceptionally low in the early 80s and attributed it to the impending death of the 911.

Porsche brass also intended to field the 928 in 1981’s 24 Hours of Le Mans, a race they knew they couldn’t win with the car they had. Schutz stipulated that they needn’t bother if they didn’t plan on winning. As a result, the modified 928s were scrapped and the company retrofitted three 936s that were sitting in the corporate museum. Porsche won that year.

The rest of Peter’s tenure as CEO revolved around improving the 911, solving Porsche quality control issues, and developing the legendary 959. The company’s worldwide sales grew from around 28,000 units in 1980 to 53,000 units in 1986. A drop in sales the following year resulted in Schutz being replaced by Heinz Branitzki in 1987. But that doesn’t matter; CEO’s aren’t made to last. The second a company hits a slump, it’s suddenly in the market for new blood — someone to save the company. And saving Porsche is exactly what Schutz did.

German automotive website GTSpirit reported that Peter Schutz passed away over the weekend at the ripe old age of 87. We can’t imagine what Porsche would look like today without him.

[Image: Porsche]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 18 comments
  • Asdf Asdf on Nov 02, 2017

    The 911 does have quite an uncertain future these days as well, because it represents an anomaly in Porsche's lineup. Porsche is an SUV manufacturer now, and the 911 is not an SUV, so it's logical that it's only a matter of time before it's axed.

    • See 5 previous
    • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Nov 02, 2017

      @Asdf Your theorem is interesting. Absolute dross, but interesting in that someone actually thinks as such.

  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Nov 04, 2017

    Drove a 993 recently. No radiator, C4S. I grew up with the 911 mystique but had never the chance to experience it. My peeps growing up had big Murican engines, not German sewing machines. Wow.. The car drives via mental telepathy. At some point, hammering out of a corner while preparing to brake for the next, I realized where I'd had this experience before....Go karts...the 911 is a Go Kart for Grownups. The wuffle of the flat six is intoxicating and you want to hear more of it. I'm told the air cooled 993 is "the last" one, and used values tend to agree...60k for a 20 year old car ? If/when I drive a modern version, will I be sad ?

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next