2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee Trailhawk 4XE Review – Getting Your Money’s Worth?

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4XE Trailhawk Fast Facts

Powertrain
2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, electric generator/motor, transmission traction motor (375 total system horsepower @ 5,250 RPM, 470 lb-ft total system torque @ 3,000 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
Eight-speed automatic, four-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG/MPGe
23 combined (EPA Rating, MPG), 56 combined (EPA Rating, MPGe)
Fuel Economy, L/100km; Le/100km
10.3 city / 9.7 highway / 10.0 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km). 4.2 combined Le/100km
Base Price
$65,260 (U.S.) / $76,790 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$72,630 (U.S.) / $84,148 (Canada)
Prices include $1,795 destination charge in the United States and $2,195 to $2,895 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

In general, I am on record as liking the 2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee. It’s one of the vehicles that I would consider buying with my own money.

I am not sure that same consideration extends to the electrified version. The 2023 Jeep Grand Cherokee 4XE costs a pretty penny, especially when you opt for the off-road-oriented Trailhawk trim, and while I like the concept of plug-in hybrids in general, this one might not be worth the dough.


My beef here is that a vehicle that costs this much should be smooth – but just like on the first-drive event I attended for this trucklet, the hybrid transitions were just a tad too janky.

That’s too bad, because 25 miles of EV-only range is nice, though not a huge amount. The theory of plugging is just fine, but the execution here isn’t as seamless as it is in the Wrangler 4XE. And it’s not entirely seamless there, either.

One cool thing is that the hybrid system allows you a lot of control – you can set to hybrid mode, or set it to run EV until the battery drains (or you need the gas engine to assist, such as with passing), or tell it to save the battery charge for later. It’s nice to have this level of control in a hybrid.

The battery is a 400-volt, 17 kWh unit. The max charging rate is 7.2 KW on Level 2. The charge time should be around 12-14 hours on Level 1 and 2-3 hours on Level 2. Giving credit where it’s due, Cars.com has a long-termer that’s seen similar numbers. I didn’t charge, since the charging situation in my building tends to make it difficult.

I also felt let down by steering that was a tad too distant and artificial in feel. Usually steering feel is a Jeep strong suit, and that’s the case in the gas JGCs I’ve driven, but for whatever reason my tester didn’t feel as dialed in.

I was also hoping for better acceleration from this powertrain, which combines a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder with a belt-driven generator motor and a transmission traction motor for a total output of 375 horsepower and 470 lb-ft.

It’s not slow, to be fair, with enough thrust for urban driving, but I’d love a bit more responsiveness and some more passing punch.

It’s unfortunate that I felt letdown enough to lead this review with the negatives, because there’s still a lot to like about the Grand Cherokee. The interior remains a strong suit, with a well-integrated infotainment screen and the right mix of traditional buttons/knobs and screens. It’s comfortable, too, though I struggled a little to get a great seating position.

I had no chance to go off-road, but I’ve driven the Trailhawk trim previously, and found it to be capable enough. It’s no Wrangler Rubicon, but it can do certain types of wheelin’ well. Off-road goodies include Jeep’s Quadra-Trac II four-wheel drive system, an electronic limited-slip differential rear axle, a disconnecting front stabilizer bar, an off-road camera, a traction management system, an air suspension, semi-active damping, and a speed control system. Ground clearance is a max of 10.9 inches.

The price of entry here is 65 grand, and other features that come standard include a trailer-tow package, front passenger screen, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, Uconnect infotainment, Wi-Fi, heated steering wheel, heated and cooled front seats, heated second-row seats, remote start, 18-inch wheels, and dual-zone climate control.

Standard safety nannies include full-speed forward-collision warning plus, adaptive cruise control, park assist, rearview camera, blind-spot and cross-path detection, advanced brake assist, hill-start assist, rear-seat object alert, and active-lane management.

Options included a $2,235 package that added intersection-collision assist, night vision, front and rear park assist, and a 360-degree camera. For $1,445, the Luxury Tech III group was added – it included hands-free power liftgate, rain-sensitive wipers, digital rearview mirror, second-row window shades, passive entry, and a steering column that is power tilt/telescope and has memory. Finally, for $1,895 you can get a dual-pane power panoramic sunroof.

With destination, we clocked in at $72,630. Woof.

The Jeep Grand Cherokee 4XE is an example of a concept that makes a lot of sense that has execution that’s lacking. If it could just be a bit smoother in its transitions, it would be interesting as a fuel-sipper compared to the internal-combustion engine versions, though the cost makes one blanche. It’s also a bummer than one must go electric to get the Trailhawk trim now.

I have no issue with electrification, and I find the concept of a plug-in hybrid to have a strong use case, at least if you have easy access to charging. So my fault-finding with the 4XE has nothing to do with Luddite knuckle-dragging or a preference for pure internal-combustion. I simply think Jeep has a good idea here that needs a bit more baking time.

Until then, I think I will opt for the ICE Grand Cherokee, even if it means opting out of the best trim for off-roading. Most of these vehicles never leave pavement, anyway.

If Jeep can smooth out the powertrain, it will have a winner. For now, the fuel savings might not be worth it.

[Images: Jeep]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • MarkInMI MarkInMI on Dec 06, 2023

    25 miles on 17kwh of electricity? At peak charging costs here of 22 cents per kwh, that's $3.75 worth of electricity. Even if you install a charger and sign up for their nighttime plan, that $2 worth of juice. You really are saving very little over burning gas after spending all that money the hybrid system and home charger -- it would never pay off.

  • John John on Dec 07, 2023

    Not everyone pays that much for power. Mine is 10 cents per kw…..

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next