Federal Investigators End Seven-Year Scrutiny of Shifters in Ram, Durango

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Tall hats at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have indicated they have wrapped an investigation into the gear selector design found in some Durango SUVs and Ram pickup trucks.

At issue were Ram 1500s from 2013 – 2017 and Dodge Durango models from 2014 – 2017 in which complaints were made to the NHSTA about incidents of vehicle roll-away after the operator allegedly shifted the transmission to Park and exited the rig. Specifically, the carping involved multiple vehicles which shared a common electronic rotary shifter design. Fun fact for gearhead trivia: these dials are manufactured by an outfit called Kostal Automotive in Germany.


Way back in 2016, the agency opened a file to investigate 43 of these rollaway incidents. During the course of this study, the Office of Defects Investigation (there’s a department name, if we ever heard one) says they did not find evidence a vehicle-based design or manufacturing defect was the cause of vehicle rollaway incidents on the subject vehicles. They then reference a so-called Customer Satisfaction Notification – think of it as a not-quite recall – which provided “automated vehicle securement” when an operator attempts to exit the vehicle without successfully jamming the thing into Park. The CSN took the form of a software update and the feds seemed reasonably satisfied it was effective in reducing the frequency of vehicle rollaway incidents in the subject vehicles. 


A recall would have been ruinously expensive. Murilee has noted on numerous occasions the specter of Ford getting away with sending out stickers instead of actually fixing their rollaway issues back in the bad old days, though that problem was a physical defect and not down to a potentially confusing design of an electronic shifter.

This author will opine that he despises trucks which slam themselves back into park when trying to move forward or backward with a door ajar. Sure, it’s not a technique taught in driving school but negotiating one’s way up to a trailer while solo (despite the phalanx of on-board cameras) or any number of other real world truck tasks requiring craning of necks are often easier with a door open – at least for us old guys. You’d think giving the option to manually turn such a feature off, even buried deep in an infotainment menu, would satisfy even the most pencil-necked of corporate lawyers.


Still, all this confab puts a bit of polish on the argument that consistently trying to reinvent shifter controls can create problems. It's worth noting differences in this case and the one focused on shifters used in machines like the Jeep Grand Cherokee.


[Images: Dodge]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • 2manyvettes 2manyvettes on Jan 31, 2024

    I have had three of these ('15 Ram, '19 Ram and '16 Durango) and never tried to back up with the door open, so I have not experienced that particular problem. I have, however, left the shifter in gear more than once when I turned off the ignition and the transmission automatically shifted to park. The '19 Ram has an electronic parking brake that automatically sets when I roll the shifter into park. Personally, I have no problem with these shifters.

  • Teddyc73 Teddyc73 on Feb 01, 2024

    43 out of hundreds of thousands. Wow, something must be amiss.

  • Bob Hey Tassos, have you seen it with top down. It's a permanent roll bar so if it flips no problem. It's the only car with one permanently there. So shoots down your issue. I had a 1998 for 10 years it was perfect, but yes slow. Hardly ever see any of them anymore.
  • 3-On-The-Tree 2007 Toyota Sienna bedsides new plugs, flat tire on I-10 in van Horn Tx on the way to Fort Huachuca.2021 Tundra Crewmax no issues2021 Rav 4 no issues2010 Corolla I put in a alternator in Mar1985 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ60 280,000mi I put in a new radiator back in 08 before I deployed, did a valve job, new fuel and oil pump. Leaky rear main seal, transmission, transfer case. Rebuild carb twice, had a recall on the gas tank surprisingly in 2010 at 25 years later.2014 Ford F159 Ecoboost 3.5L by 80,000mi went through both turbos, driver side leaking, passenger side completely replaced. Rear min seal leak once at 50,000 second at 80,000. And last was a timing chain cover leak.2009 C6 Corvette LS3 Base, I put in a new radiator in 2021.
  • ChristianWimmer 2018 Mercedes A250 AMG Line (W177) - no issues or unscheduled dealer visits. Regular maintenance at the dealer once a year costs between 400,- Euros (standard service) to 1200,- Euros (major service, new spark plugs, brake pads + TÜV). Had one recall where they had to fix an A/C hose which might become loose. Great car and fun to drive and very economical but also fast. Recently gave it an “Italian tune up” on the Autobahn.
  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Next