The 2025 Mazda CX-70: Right-Sizing UPDATED

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Imagine this: You're looking for a crossover with a pinch of sportiness. None of the current crop of two-rows in the upper $30K to $50K range are doing it for you. You like the swoopy Mazda CX-90 but it's too big for your wants and needs. You hear the phrase "zoom zoom" whispered by unseen forces. You get to your Mazda dealer and see that a new contender has emerged. Enter the 2025 Mazda CX-70.


The all-new CX-70 shares a lot of its bones with the CX-90, its exterior duds aren't just a shrunken-down copy. It's not smaller -- an earlier version of this post said it was, I had a brain cramp and I regret the error -- though it does lose the third row. It's less curvy and a bit more slab-sided, with a more-aggressive grille. The CX-90 is meant to give off a luxury vibe, while the CX-70's design leans more heavily, at least on the outside, into the oft-real perception that Mazda bakes sportiness into all of its vehicles.

Full disclosure: Mazda flew me to New York City for a night and put me in a fancy hotel and paid for meals so that I could take photos of the CX-70 and chat with the PR team about it. The vehicles I photographed are pre-production Canadian spec and American-spec models will have some minor visual differences, depending on trim/packaging.

I didn't get to drive the CX-70 -- hopefully that comes later -- in Manhattan. But I was able to shoot a bunch of photos and crawl around the interior.

I can't fairly judge material quality on early builds like these, so I won't. What I can say is the cabin looks a lot like what's found in the larger CX-90, and that's a good thing. It's an attractive design.

Mazda has put some clever storage options into the rear, and the cargo area seemed to easily swallow some luggage that the brand had on hand for demonstration purposes. There's an upscale look and feel here -- especially if you get the red Nappa leather that's exclusive to this model.

It's easy to praise a vehicle when it's standing still, so all early opinions should be taken with a bit more salt than I put on my French fries. This could all fall apart when I drive it, but the CX-70 looks, at first glance, to be at least competitive.

Speaking of driving it -- buyers will have two powertrain choices. Just like with the CX-90, you can get a 3.3-liter turbocharged inline-six with a mild hybrid boost or a plug-in hybrid pairing a 2.5-liter, naturally-aspirated four-cylinder to an electric motor. I don't see power numbers in the press materials Mazda provided, but in the CX-90 that the 3.3-liter makes 340 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque while the PHEV, which has a 17.8 kWh battery, makes 323 ponies and 369 lb-ft of torque. The mild hybrid in the 3.3 has a 48-volt setup.

I don't expect to see the base inline-six from the CX-90, and I do expect that the CX-70 will use an eight-speed automatic and have all-wheel drive available if not standard.

Mazda will officially unveil the vehicle right around press time, so we will update with specs as we get them.

We don't have pricing yet but I'd guess a high-$30K starting point with loaded models checking in around $50K or maybe a tick under.

Key available features not previously mentioned include 21-inch black wheels, black interior accents, remote-folding rear seats, cargo hooks, sub-floor storage in the cargo area, a driver-assist system that stops the vehicle should the driver become unresponsive, and Amazon Alexa integration.

We're barely scratching the surface here -- Mazda is probably going to give us more detail at launch, as automakers often do. For now, my initial take is that the CX-70 looks good -- though I prefer the curviness of the CX-90 -- and has, on paper, the proper bonafides to be a sporty two-row crossover with the type of utility features crossover buyers need.

Now, let's drive the dang thing.

[Images © 2024 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Johnny Lumber Johnny Lumber on Jan 31, 2024

    Not a big fan on using Android auto with Google maps on a horizontal screen. Tried it in an Accor and bits of the map were overlayed with other information.

  • Zipper69 Zipper69 on Feb 01, 2024

    "Slab sided" is an understatement.

    The black version especially, looks bottom heavy, out of proportion with the cabin.

  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next