Rivian Introduces $45,000 R2, Surprises With R3

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

In a California two-fer, electric vehicle manufacturer Rivian rolled out a pair of new EVs today, both of which have deep familial resemblances and a host of appeal to overlanders.

Starting with the hotly anticipated R2, of course. This son-of-R1S looks a lot like its big brother but, as the below comparisons demonstrate, has a much more agreeable footprint for anyone living in an urban area. And let’s be clear – that’s the type of customer to whom most of these will be sold, earmarked for weekend warrior overlanding and the like when its owner wishes to escape the concrete jungle for a few days.

Pricing is set to start at $45,000 and go up from there. The trim walk will include dual- and tri-motor variants, the latter of which should be good to scarper from a dead stop to highway speeds in less than three seconds. CEO of the joint, RJ Scaringe, made a remark that all types will have at least 300 miles of range. At 185.6 inches long and 66.9 inches tall, the R2 is within spitting distance of the Model Y in terms of length but stands a few inches taller.

Inside, look for a minimalist appearance found in so many EVs, typical of the industry. The company took feedback on concerns about interior storage and made changes, whilst also carrying over the R1S’ huge frunk. All seats can be folded flat for sleeping and the rear hatchback glass can rise independently for ease of access.

Surprising the tar out of most were the R3 and R3X, two models which will stoke even more fires in the hearts of people who like to argue if something is a crossover or hatchback. Sized smaller again than the R2, the R3 gives off Panda 4x4 vibes – which is not wholly a bad thing and is parlayed to good effect in the R3X with its knobby tires and skiffs of orange trim. No details were given for pricing or production estimates but it is reasonable to think that entry-level trims will start under 45 large since that’s the R2’s price point.


Speaking of, the R2 is planned for roll out in the first half of 2026.


[Image: Rivian]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Sayahh Sayahh on Mar 08, 2024

    "[Rivian] R2, [Citroën] C3. C3, R2"


    C3: "nice to meet you."


    R2: "beep, beep, whistle, beep."

  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Mar 08, 2024

    Making the Rivian shorter is a good call. It's current proportions look silly to me.... like one of GM's L spec'd full size SUVs. It's the back end that's way too long.


    Are Rivian vehicles reliable? I have not paid attention to rumblings either way.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next