The Grand Tour's "A Scandi Flick" Crashes, Bangs, and Contrives to Fill Its Length

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

It’s been nearly three years since The Grand Tour switched its format away from the elaborate traveling tent and to its all-special format. On Friday, Amazon released the fifth such special, and the first “post pandemic” episode (their term, not mine). In “A Scandi Flick,” the familiar trio heads across Scandinavia in three rally-inspired all-wheel drive sedans. It’s certainly not the show’s worst work, but it’s far from the best. You’ll need to suspend disbelief and leave your thinking skills in another room.

(Warning: Big spoilers are ahead, so if you want to avoid them then stop here.)


The new special is the longest in the show’s revised format portfolio, as the first three episodes “Seamen,” “ A Massive Hunt,” and " Lochdown” all spanned an hour and 30 minutes, while “ Carnage A Trois” was an hour and eight minutes. The premise is an interesting one this time, and avoids the corny “What’s with this and that?” prompt of both “Lochdown” and “Carnage A Trois.” Clarkson explains that for this episode the team wants to explore the world of the 2000s rally-inspired four-door. 


An interesting topic for sure, but there’s an immediate flaw in the prompt when the presenters pull their cars around for a first look. Hammond selects the most obvious car in the class, a 2003 Subaru Impreza WRX STi, while May goes for the second car any enthusiast would think of, a 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII. For his choice, Clarkson goes with a 2007 Audi RS4. 


Immediately, Clarkson is lambasted for his RS4 choice because “it’s not a Quattro.” Hammond and May are referring to the B2 Audi Quattro that went rallying in the Eighties, and its accompanying road-going version. Clarkson defends his selection saying that Audi has a long rallying history, which it does. 


But as the question is limited to four-doors, the Quattro (out of production since 1991) was off-limits anyway. It was a two-door hatchback, and that latter characteristic was shared by almost all rally cars in the 90s and 2000s. Four-doors were the rare exception, and Subaru and Mitsubishi made the only spicy road-going versions a consumer could purchase.

One thing to note about this particular episode (unlike “A Massive Hunt”), is how the trio is intent on enjoying themselves throughout. The unscripted moments in shops and on the road bring back a feeling of the old Top Gear episodes. And that’s been lacking in much of The Grand Tour back catalog.


The three of them are assigned to explore which of their cars is the best by traveling 600 miles across Norway, Sweden, and Finland and completing challenges. It’s a classic Top Gear prompt for sure. The team is assured by various news outlets they’ll be in the wilderness for most of their journey. A map is shown with the route but does not include cities or points of interest, only national borders. Start suspending belief here.


The snowy Scandinavian landscape reveals itself immediately and stays put through the entire show. As usual for The Grand Tour it’s all excellently filmed, and accompanied by appropriately subtle background music. The show does nature shots and sweeping views of roads so perfectly.


Accompanying the team is the expected Terrible Backup Car, a Volvo 345 in this instance. It’s communist-looking and from the Eighties, and doesn’t really fit the program, apart from its Swedish origin. It’s first noticed early on when they visit a shop to buy some cold-weather car supplies for the wilderness. Eventually, it vanishes but that doesn’t matter.


Almost immediately the first challenge takes place, in a submarine base located within a mountain. There’s a straight stretch of tunnel that presents an opportunity for a speed and bravery test, which can’t happen outdoors because of the weather. Clarkson goes first, and in a moment James May probably regrets, he goes next. 

His Evo loses traction upon braking at the end of the tunnel, and the yellow car fishtails and slams driver’s side into the concrete wall at considerable speed. Viewers are presented with the footage as it happens, and see James hit his head against the window and B-pillar of the Mitsubishi as he crashes. EMS are present immediately, and various crew look on as a bloodied and shaken James gets out of his wrecked Evo.


May is absent from the episode for a while as he’s in the hospital, and has a broken rib. He sticks around in Norway as the other two cross into Sweden to continue the journey. It’s around this moment, 28 minutes in, that the episode starts its decline.


Hammond and Clarkson find a shop “in the wilderness” where they can modify their cars and get them more rally-ish. Clarkson applies an excellent Audi Sport livery to his RS4, and Hammond goes for a classic Martini racing livery on the WRX. Clarkson also adds a special feature to his exhaust, a flamethrower.


A theoretical flamethrower, that is. In an unusual turn for the show, CGI flames are presented instead of real fire. Perhaps laws or lawyers prevented the real thing, but when Clarkson presses the Flame On button some unconvincing CGI does the rest. The two do some rally driving on a frozen lake that’s been plowed into a race track, which they just happen to find on their drive. The driving is entertaining, at least. 

May hires a shop to repair the extensive damage done to the Evo, which allows him to join the other two at the frozen lake at about the 40 minute mark. The Evo is clearly worse for wear, but still in functioning condition. Skiers turn up at the lake, and then a race ensues as the sedans tow their human skier cargo around as fast as possible. It’s all very choreographed as it would be too dangerous to do it for real.


Driving through more “wilderness,” the team ends up spending the night in a wood survival hut they find that’s filled with meat. Turns out they fail to notice they’re at a museum property, and wake up in the morning surrounded by tour groups. Hammond has covered Clarkson’s Audi completely with ice, and Clarkson dumps gasoline on the Audi’s hood to help get the door open (?). It’s time for more fire, which also looks like CGI.


At an hour into the episode it’s out of steam and out of material, but keeps on going. At a restaurant the trio see a house being moved across a town. This prompts them to put their own accommodation on skis, because they’re about to be “in the wilderness.” The reason there’s no information shown when a map is presented becomes obvious, because the team has been in or near populated areas at almost all times during the journey. 

A couple of minutes elapse and the trio has their selected homes on skis, which they proceed to drive around and crash into snow banks, dumpsters, “important signs,” and similar. The team reiterates they don’t know where they’re going at different points, and drives into the evening. A serious storm happens so they call it a night, and park where they are.


This is of course at a ski resort, at the top of a ski slope. Antics ensue, and they take turns heading down the ski slope. Clarkson decides to push a sleeping Hammond down the slope in his portable house in a moment of attempted murder. Fortunately, the house is miraculously stable and Hammond incurs no injury when he slams into the barrier at the base of the slope. 


We’re still watching a car show as Clarkson takes the RS4 down the slope with his house attached. He accidentally presses the CGI fire button, which lights his wooden house on fire for real. May leaves his trailer at the top of the hill because he can’t figure out how to attach it to the Evo.

The final gag lasts for 15 minutes as the team drive across a handy plowed frozen lake so they can speed toward their final destination (an airport) in time. Suddenly they know exactly where they’re going. May drives his car into a soft patch of ice in the middle of the lake, and accidentally falls through. Hammond and Clarkson create a rudimentary winch device out of wood which miraculously works, but the Evo is theoretically ruined once again.


The show ends with yet another accident! The presenters hop on a private jet and take off, while the crew stands there in dismay. They aren’t supposed to take off on that plane, it’s a prop! They’re supposed to take off on a commercial airliner parked just nearby. Those ornery presenters!


“A Scandi Flick” is about 45 minutes of content presented in an hour and 39. The team are enjoying themselves throughout, but lots of fluff and script should have been left on the editing floor along with the CGI. It’s certainly better than “Carnage A Trois” and “A Massive Hunt,” but pales against “Seamen” and the 2019 Mongolia special “Survival of the Fattest.” It’s only a fun watch if you don’t think about it too hard. 


[Images: Amazon Prime]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Sep 26, 2022

    This is still the only 'car' show that our entire family enjoys. This is not Willie Mays with the Mets style of decline. More like Gretzky with the Blues. It may not be their 'best' work but when it works the magic is still there.

  • Bunkie Bunkie on Sep 28, 2022

    It's really just a modern, automotive take on the Three Stooges. Suspend disbelief, lower your expectations and just enjoy it, it's not really a car show.


    Although, I must admit, I did go browsing through cars.com for an S4 with the 4.2...

  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next