Junkyard Find: 1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D With 417k Miles

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

If you owned a car that had traveled more than 400,000 miles during its life, could you bear to send it into the cold steel jaws of The Crusher? In the course of my junkyard adventures, I've found quite a few vehicles that met such a fate. Here's a very solid Mercedes-Benz W123 oil-burner that now languishes in a self-service boneyard in Phoenix, Arizona.

417,046 miles is about the same as traveling 16-¾ times around Earth (using a great circle route, of course), and that distance is impressive even by Mercedes-Benz diesel standards.

417,046 miles is enough to get this car into 11th place in the Murilee Martin Junkyard Odometer standings. Remember that 1985 W123 with 411,448 miles we saw in a Denver car graveyard a few years back? That car has been pushed down to 16th in the MMJO list.

Don't worry about a lack of Stuttgart iron in the MMJO Top Ten, Mercedes-Benz fans, because there are three at the moment:

  1. 1990 Volvo 240, 631k miles
  2. 1988 Honda Accord, 626k miles
  3. 1987 Mercedes-Benz 190E, 601k miles
  4. 1981 Mercedes-Benz 300 SD, 572k miles
  5. 1985 Mercedes-Benz 300 SD, 535k miles
  6. 1988 Honda Accord, 513k miles
  7. 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo, 493k miles
  8. 1990 Nissan Sentra, 440k miles
  9. 1991 Honda Accord, 435k miles
  10. 1996 Honda Civic, 435k miles

For those keeping nationalistic score, that's two cars built in Sweden, three built in West Germany, three built in the United States (the Sentra and the pair of 1990s Hondas), and two built in Japan. I'm sure there would be more Mercedes-Benzes on the list if junkyard shoppers didn't buy most W123 and W126 gauge clusters within days of hitting the yards, and more American-marque machinery if Detroit hadn't stuck with five-digit odometers until well into the 1990s.

Here's the legendary OM617 five-cylinder turbodiesel engine that got the job done so well. A junkyard customer showed up to extract the injectors while I was admiring this car.

This one was rated at 120 horsepower and 170 pound-feet, which wasn't a lot for a car scaling in at 3,585 pounds (fun fact: the current C-Class weighs quite a bit more than 1982's proto-E-Class). However, its naturally-aspirated sibling, the legendarily slow 240 D, had just 67 horses and 97 pound-feet.

American Mercedes-Benz shoppers in 1982 could get the 240 D with a four-on-the-floor manual transmission, but a four-speed automatic was mandatory on the U.S.-market 300 D.

It appears that the first chapters of this car's life took place on the roads of Southern California. Amato's Auto Body is still in the same location in San Diego shown on this sticker; the seven-digit telephone number suggests that the sticker is of 1990s or earlier vintage.

The sticker from Heinz Geitz's repair shop in La Jolla led me to a lot of interesting tales of the life and career of Herr Geitz (who passed away in 2017 at the age of 97). After spending most of World War II in a Soviet POW camp, he emigrated to the United States and took a job working for Mercedes-Benz here. In 1956, he became crew chief for Augie Pabst (yes, from that Pabst family), then migrated to La Jolla during the 1960s. His grandson founded HG Performance, a Mercedes-Benz tuner shop in San Marcos, that exists to the present day. You'll find plenty of history in the junkyard if you dig a little bit!

Cars that live near the Pacific in California can get some terrifying top-down rust from salt spray mixed with morning fog, but this car has just a touch of corrosion around the rear wheelwells from rainwater leakage past the trunk's weatherstripping.

The interior appears to have been in nice condition before junkyard shoppers bought most of the door panels and seats.

MB-Tex fake leather is amazing stuff. Ordinary upholstery would have been nuked into powder by four decades in the climate of San Diego and Phoenix.

In the end, even the BVM couldn't save this car from its junkyard fate.

The timing of the turbocharger-toting technician walking the banked oval worked out well for everyone involved in this commercial.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

1982 Mercedes-Benz 300 D W123 in Arizona wrecking yard.

[Images: The author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 30 comments
  • ChristianWimmer ChristianWimmer on Oct 16, 2023

    Some thoughts.


    All cars from this era appear to us as being mechanically simple and thus easy to work on. I think for the most part this is true, even on W123s which despite this were a little more complicated than your average 1970s car. These things are all over Africa and the Middle East, still soldiering on after their odometers stopped working at 999,999 km 20 years ago - literally. But the folks there know how to work on these and have also developed their own tools or spares to keep them running. There’s a great documentary on Youtube in German called “Autos für die Ewigkeit” and it’s mainly about old Mercedes cars and trucks in South America, Africa and the Middle East with hundreds of thousands of kilometers or in many cases over a million kilometers behind them (some trucks in Brazil had something like 4.3 million kilometers on his 1960s Mercedes Kurzhauber truck) and was still using it as a daily truck. What I found fascinating about this documentary is that it showed the people in these regions creating their own tools for maintenance or creating a spare parts in some backyard mechanic shop. Fascinating!


    I disagree with the claim that modern cars are built to “last the length of the lease”. In my experience modern cars are actually much better made than older cars. The old-school “solid door shut feel” of Mercedes’ was in my experience not unique to them. Old cars are heavy and usually had thicker doors as a form of safety I suppose. Modern cars are all about lightweight construction to save weight and improve fuel economy. A 1972-1980 Mercedes W116 S-Class had doors which shut and felt like a bank vault. It’s successor, the 1979-1993 W126 S-Class was put on a diet and had weight reduction wherever possible and as a consequence its doors didn’t shut with that “bank vault” thud feel. The same applies to the W123’s successor, the W124, which was lightened and thus didn’t feel as solid as a W123. Doesn’t mean the car was built to a lesser standard.


    I think the fact that some people lease cars gives them a bad reputation in the first place. Think about it. Someone leasing a car isn’t necessarily going to treat it right or abide by maintenance schedules. Why should they? They don’t care about the future of this car or the second owner when they will lease the facelifted or new model after three years. I’ve ridden with people who gunned their leased car with a cold engine and abused it - stuff like that is gonna damage the engine over time if this is repetitive behavior. A modern car with proper treatment from the owner will be just as reliable if not more so than an older car. I don’t even think most owners of modern turbo cars know how to treat them properly: drive them warm, drive them cold and they should be fine.


    I’ve treated all my German cars well and never had any serious mechanical issues or problems that would make me call them unreliable. I also don’t think that electronics these days are going to be a big problem overall. Technology evolves and gets better. Electronics might have been a weakspot on most cars in the late 1990s and early 200s, but these days manufacturers or better yet their suppliers have gotten these things perfected to the point where they will remain functional and reliable for decades. Hell, I am typing this on a 16-year-old laptop which has never had an issue and while slow[er] than before, it still works, graphics card etc. all work fine.

  • Jeff_M Jeff_M on Oct 17, 2023

    When I saw the pic of that diesel engine I paused to put my hand over my heart. What a masterpiece of an engine, and I don't care if it IS slow. And then, the comment about the MB-tex had me doing the same thing. Mercedes has achieved quite a few levels of greatness over the years.

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Oct 17, 2023

      They forget it all and started building limited lifespan products.


  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
  • Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
  • Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
Next