Rare Rides: The 1988 Mitsubishi Wagon, Forgotten Long Ago

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Rare Rides has featured a couple of JDM import vans previously, namely the Mazda Bongo and Toyota Town Ace. Today’s van is of similar JDM fashion, except this Mitsubishi is one of the few examples actually sold in North America during the model’s very short domestic run.

Let’s learn a bit more about the only large van Mitsubishi ever sold in America. Once again, it’s Van Time.

Known by various names all over the world, Mitsubishi’s van offering was always called Delica at home. It entered production late in 1968 for the ’69 model year, and consisted of a cargo van body applied to a tiny cab-over pickup. Simple as it was, the Delica established itself as an almost immediate market success around the world. Especially successful in Indonesia, the tiny van was marketed as the Colt. Colt branding was so powerful the word was adopted into local lexicon to mean small van.

1979 brought with it a second-generation Delica that was much larger, carrying an appearance more consistent with a modern cab-over Japanese van. Another long-lived generation, the second Delica was in production for most markets through 1986. It lived through 2018 in Indonesia, and its Seventies design continues production in the Philippines today.

In 1986, the third-generation Delica expanded the lineup with regard to branding, engine, and transmission offerings. Wearing 13 different badges depending on market, the Delica was initially produced in five different countries. It was popular enough that Mitsubishi extended its run through 2013, and the van is still made in Taiwan today. Available engines included various inline-fours burning gasoline and diesel, and ranging in displacement from 1.4 liters to 2.6 liters. Transmissions were of four, five, or six speeds, and included manual and automatic varieties. Four-wheel drive was available in some configurations.

Japanese manufacturers were caught by surprise with the instant success of the Chrysler minivan in the mid-Eighties. Prior to 1987, Mitsubishi offered no van in the North American market; the closest product was the Expo MPV. Hopeful they could shift an all-new product in America, Mitsubishi brought over their Van and Wagon for the 1987 model year. Van was chosen as the label for cargo carrying Mitsubishis with no side windows, while Wagon was used for passenger version. The only available engine for North American market vans was the largest 2.4-liter gasoline unit (which would later power the Eclipse).

However, North Americans never warmed too well to cab-over vans, no matter who tried to shift them. The poor crash protection, awkward entry and exit, and less-than-ideal handling put customers straight into domestic showrooms (and forced creation of product like the Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna). Available only until 1990, the Mitsubishi Van and Wagon were quickly forgotten. Enthusiast interest continues for the international four-wheel-drive Delica models, which are regularly imported to the US by an enterprising specialist dealer.

Today’s Rare Ride was for sale in San Francisco, with a pristine brown velour interior. With its rarity and superb condition, it lasted online just two days before being sold. The ask was $3,400.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • RandyW RandyW on Feb 13, 2023

    I didn't know they imported a standard transmission into the US. I'll check my service manual and see if it makes reference to it.

  • Charles Charles on Jun 04, 2023

    I had one and loved it . Seated 7 people . Easy to park , great van


  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next