An Outdoorsier GMC Canyon Waits in the Wings

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Adventurous types looking for off-road fun from their local GM dealer already have the option of choosing the brawny Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 and its butchier Bison variant, which leaves GM’s truck-only GMC brand as something as a spectator. GMC hasn’t gone whole-hog into the off-road midsizer niche, though it does offer its Canyon pickup in All Terrain trim. Cutaway front fenders are most definitely not included.

The same dynamic may exist after 2020, but the All Terrain will be gone, replaced with an AT4 trim that hopefully goes the extra mile in terms of off-the-beaten-track capability.

According to details blabbed by GMC at a recent first drive event, the Canyon gains GMC’s AT4 trim line for 2021, GM Authority reports. A teaser view of the upcoming lux-brawn truck was shown at the Wyoming event, bearing no shortage of front-end camo.

Can midsize truck fans expect the same treatment as the ZR2? Not likely; the more likely reason for the camo is simply because, as the publication recently learned from insider sources, the mildest of refreshes — so mild, it seems, that GM ‘s apparently not even calling it one — is on the way for 2021. The upcoming Canyon AT4 may just bear the updated grille born of this mid-cycle tweak.

AT4 is not a snorkel-sporting TRD, nor is it ZR2, but it does give a GMC truck added brush-beating content (heavily dependent on model, of course. Keep in mind there’ll soon be a Terrain AT4). Debuting on the new-for-2019 Sierra, AT4 represents a step down from Denali in terms of interior niceties, with the full-sizer gaining a two-inch lift and Rancho monotube shocks. Skid plates abound.

Having made so much coin off its Denali sub-brand, GMC saw no reason not to add a second. Within a year, AT4 will be a brand-wide offering.

And the Canyon AT4 will surely follow in the same vein as its larger stablemate, though what buyers can expect in terms of ride height remains to be seen. Certainly, the AT4 will be an upgrade over the existing Canyon All Terrain both inside and out, and its price will surely reflect this.

The question of whether a Canyon AT4 will stimulate additional interest in the model is also unanswered at this point. Compared to its Chevy twin, the Canyon lags well behind in popularity — not unexpected, given GMC’s premium pretensions. Still, “less popular” is okay as long as sales remain stable.

The Colorado and Canyon reportedly still have four years left in their current form, and while Canyon sales rose 12 percent in the first half of 2019, Ford’s rival Ranger has a laundry list of trims waiting to challenge the GM siblings. This wasn’t a concern when the current-gen GMs debuted.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • TheDumbGuy TheDumbGuy on Aug 20, 2019

    All of these expensive, pretty trucks. For gentleman farmers and twice-a-year handymen. Ah, that is the life ! Did I say expensive ?

  • Akear Akear on Aug 20, 2019

    This is yet another cheaply built GM truck with a fisher price-level interior.

  • JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
  • Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
  • TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
Next