2018 New York Auto Show Recap - Optimism in the City

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Outside of my hometown of Chicago, New York City remains one of my favorite metropolises. I don’t know why – Manhattan is overstuffed with cars and people, garbage is put out on the sidewalks, hotel rooms are no oasis from street noise, and most goods and services are way too expensive.

Perhaps New York has a unique sort of charm that compensates for all its flaws, some sort of charisma that continues to exist despite the continuing transformation of Manhattan into a living Disney city for the wealthy.

I mean, in what other city would I be brazenly approached by a young man trying to sell me cocaine as I walked back to my hotel after some late-night pizza (partake, I did not. Drugs aren’t my thing. Pizza was good, though) while almost within sight of the most famous urban intersection in the world – one that was undoubtedly crowded to the gills even at that hour? In what other city would I have a surreal on-street argument with a fellow pedestrian over an innocent, touristy picture I took of a street sign? There’s this “only in New York” feeling, a sense that certain things happen to you that just wouldn’t elsewhere.

It’s the kind of place where you can swear bloody murder because the F train didn’t show, but find value in the 40-minute walk across lower Manhattan you undertake instead, all because you don’t feel like doing the logical thing and hailing a cab. SoHo, Little Italy, and Chinatown all look much better from on foot.

I took that walk to go see the new AT4 trim level of the 2019 GMC Sierra, one that likely won’t be seen much on NYC streets. That was two days, give or take, before the first press day of the 2018 New York Auto Show. Three days almost to the minute after I saw that new truck, I looked out the window of my plane as it took off from LaGuardia, hoping for one last glimpse at the skyline and a few more seconds of reflection on the show – but gray skies clouded my vision and my eyes involuntarily shut as the post-show fatigue hit.

When I awoke over Lake Michigan, I started mulling over a show that was busy but not insanely so. There was a little something for everyone, from mainstream sedans to compact crossovers to concepts to a rear-drive Lincoln SUV. Sure, some things were missing, as Bark notes, but unlike this year’s Detroit show, which was truck-centric, New York sort of touched all bases. Fitting, since the Mets were wrapping their first game of the season as my cab dropped me off at the airport, within sight of Citi Field.

I walked away from the show with a strange sense of optimism – I found myself liking the products on the floor, at least at first glance, more than I typically do.

Let’s start with Nissan. The current-gen Altima has been the forgotten one in the midsize sedan class almost since it launched. I’ve always found it perfectly pleasant to drive, but also extremely easy to forget. It’s not fun to drive like a Mazda 6, nor is it a jack of all trades like the Camry. The last time I drove one, I remembered it more for the fuel economy and trunk space (ample room for four adults’ luggage) than for any other reason. Large, comfortable, fuel efficient, and bland as hell – that was my take.

Nissan learned its lesson. Not only in the styling department – the new Altima borrows so much from the larger Maxima that I kept calling it by the other’s name – but in other ways, too. For one, the brand is bringing the variable-compression turbo tech from the Infiniti QX50 into the Altima. For another, the Altima is now the first Nissan sedan to ever offer AWD in the U.S. ProPilot Assist, which allows for limited autonomous driving, is also available. All of this shows me Nissan is making an effort to get buyers that aren’t fleet managers to pay attention to the Altima again.

Next up on my list is Volkswagen. The Atlas Cross Sport Concept made me roll my eyes – yay, a five-seat Atlas! You can sort of achieve the same thing by buying a Tiguan and folding down the useless third row. The Tanoak truck concept, though – funny name aside, I do want. I’m a sucker for car-like midsize pickups like the Ridgeline, probably because I live in a city and the big cowboy Cadillacs don’t work for me. I really hope it gets built.

Moving on, I dig the new Toyota RAV4 and its more-rugged styling. But let’s face it, it could look like the automotive equivalent of a platypus and Toyota would move as many as it can build.

I also have cautious optimism for the Acura RDX, but recent brand history is going to be a bit hard to overcome.

Now to the disappointments. I have little to say about the Subaru Forester because I didn’t get much time near it, but I am bummed there’s one less manual transmission option out there, and sad to see the XT trim go.

I find the Aviator perfectly fine but I worry about using a smartphone as a key – the TTAC staff is even more verklempt about the possibly of not having a fob.

Then there’s the Cadillac XT4. I wrote the post on it, and as I went through the specs my initial take was that it was just par for the course for the class. I thought it looked OK in photos. But seeing it up close – well, I don’t feel as good about it. The front-end styling is attractive enough, but Matt Posky and I took note of the plastic cladding, with Matt being especially repulsed. The whole package felt underdone, like a steak taken off the grill too soon.

That’s unacceptable for a $35K vehicle that moves into the $40K range with popular options and will compete in the luxury class. It’s almost as if Cadillac thought that slapping its name on a compact crossover will be enough. And maybe, given the popularity of crossovers, that’s the correct thinking, at least from a sales perspective. But it feels like a disservice to a proud brand that still offers up good product and just dropped a honkin’ V8 into the CT6 V-Sport.

Maybe the XT4 will drive well enough to assuage my concerns. We shall see. Right now, though, I am not optimistic.

Not optimistic regarding the XT4, sure, but overall feeling better about the slate of unveils at an auto show than I’ve felt in a while. And I didn’t even mention all of them – I only had so much time and wasn’t able to spend much of it at Kia or Hyundai. I’ve also glossed over the Mazda Kai Concept which, despite what Mazda PR won’t say, is almost certainly the next 3 (I dig it), the next Corolla (thumbs up), and the Honda Insight (intriguing), as well as the Genesis concept I never got near.

New York’s auto show has always struck me as contradictory – an auto show in a place where I’d rather do anything but drive? New York may not be the most natural city for an auto show, but so what? Somewhere between the $16 sandwiches (not a typo) and $8 beers, the city that never stops lightening your wallet still manages to serve as a good host.

Now, about that VW kastenwagen…

[Images © 2018 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • DEVILLE88 DEVILLE88 on Apr 03, 2018

    I like the cady, the other 2 dont care for. I wouldnt waste my time or money to go to the auto show as it's got to be the most underwhelming pile of cars ever. The bright spot? The Cadillac Escala hope they bulid it. this is really what Cady needs. if they dont produce it as is..............they truly are stupid!!

  • Slavuta Slavuta on Apr 03, 2018

    "Perhaps New York has a unique sort of charm ..." what charm? If you said Boston or Munich...

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next