TTAC News Round-up: GM Plans to Sell You Things Inside Your Own Car

by Matt Posky

Published: October 26th, 2016

ttac news round up gm plans to sell you things inside your own car

General Motors is teaming up with IBM to implement Watson’s artificial intelligence so that it can advertise while you are trying to drive. Your dashboard is about to become a billboard.

That, Uber delivers a truckload of beer using a self-driving vehicle, Mini’s Countryman gains size and compatibility with electricity, and Hyundai’s earnings tank… after the break!

OnStar is getting an Advertising AI

The Detroit News reports that General Motors and IBM Corp. are partnering to produce the auto industry’s first cognitive mobility platform, allowing GM to send personalized marketing offers to millions of drivers beginning early next year.

“Personalized marketing” is code for rampant targeted advertising beamed directly into your car.

The companies said OnStar Go will use the artificial intelligence capabilities of IBM’s Watson — the computer that was a contestant on Jeopardy in 2011 — to offer deals and advice in the vehicle dashboard. GM says the system could help a driver avoid traffic, assist in paying for gas, or order a cup of coffee while en route to pick it up.

However, as none of those things are even remotely difficult or time consuming in the first place, this just seems like a good way to ensure OnStar users making use of specific products and brands. Initial partners include MasterCard, ExxonMobil, Glympse, iHeartRadio and Parkopedia. So expect to use your in-car payment methods to be MasterCard only and your fuel-finding app to recommend ExxonMobil stations above all others.

Watson will even be able to learn a driver’s preferences, and companies working with IBM and OnStar can tailor location-based offers to specific vehicles. The companies said the system would be available in more than 2 million vehicles in the United States that feature 4G LTE Wi-Fi hotspots by the end of 2017. It also will be available to millions of GM-brand app mobile devices.

World’s First: Uber drops off beer not already inside someone

Bloomberg is reporting that a tractor trailer full of beer drove itself down Colorado’s I-25 last week with nobody behind the wheel. Uber Technologies Inc. and Anheuser-Busch teamed up on the delivery, which they said is the first time a self-driving truck had been used to make a commercial shipment.

Escorted by the police, the 18-wheeler chugged along for 120 miles while a truck driver relaxed in the sleeper cab. The delivery is largely a publicity stunt to show the public that Otto, the self-driving vehicle group that Uber acquired in July, could successfully put an autonomous truck on public roads without it resulting in disaster.

“We wanted to show that the basic building blocks of the technology are here; we have the capability of doing that on a highway,” said Lior Ron, the president and co-founder of Uber’s Otto unit. “We are still in the development stages, iterating on the hardware and software.”

Anheuser-Busch estimates it could save $50 million a year in the U.S. if it deploys autonomous trucks across its distribution network — even if drivers continued to ride along and supplement the technology. Obviously that dollar figure would jump if they just laid everyone off.

That won’t happen just yet. The truck can only drive autonomously on the highway, meaning drivers shouldn’t have to worry about finding a new profession anytime soon. “The focus has really been and will be for the future on the highway,” Ron said. “Over 95 percent of the hours driven are on the highway. Even in the future as we start doing more, we still think a driver is needed in terms of supervising the vehicle.”

Mini’s not-so-small Countryman goes plug-in hybrid

As previously announced, the new 2017 Mini Countryman is available as a plug-in hybrid for the first time. Mini is also offering up their all-wheel-drive as optional for every drivetrain. But the AWD system on the terribly named Cooper S E Countryman ALL4 hybrid will differ from the rest. Since the three-cylinder combustion engine powers the front wheels and the electric motor works on the rear, only one system is active at any time until conditions require all-wheel drive. The car operates in three distinct modes, one of which will hold the battery at a 90 percent charge until the driver wants to use it.

The Countryman’s length has stretched an additional 7.7 inches, and its width has increased by 1.3 inches. The base front-wheel-drive Minis come with a 134 horsepower 1.5-liter turbocharged three-cylinder mated to a six-speed manual or six-speed automatic transmission. More expensive Cooper S crossovers have the option of an eight-speed auto and a 189 hp 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder power source.

The top-trim hybrid Mini produces 221 horsepower and 284 pound-feet of torque, but manual transmissions go out the window when you go electric. Under the best of conditions, the hybrid can travel 24 miles on electric power alone, though that mode is limited to a friendly 77 mph. Recharging the lithium-ion batteries at a 3.6-kilowatt wall box takes roughly the same time as a long movie. Charging using a standard 110-volt outlet will be a movie marathon, however.

Hyundai’s third quarter is even worse than expected

Hyundai Motor’s third-quarter profit fell to its lowest point in nearly seven years, well below already low forecasts. Fortune said the company attributes the poor showing to production-crippling strikes and weak demand in emerging markets.

South Korea’s largest automaker said its July-September earnings fell 10 percent from a year earlier to 1.06 trillion won ($937 million). Analysts had forecast 1.3 trillion won in earnings according to FactSet, a financial data provider.

Hyundai said its sales in January-September declined 2 percent from the year before, falling both at home and overseas. With the sport utility vehicle market growing everywhere, Hyundai has had difficulties producing SUVs and crossovers. They’ve also had difficulty with production in general.

Workers walked out of annual wage negotiations for 212 hours, from July to September, severely disrupting manufacturing to the tune of 95,000 vehicles.

[Images: General Motors; Uber; BMW Group; Hyundai Motors]

#AutonomousFuture #CarAdvertising #GeneralMotors #Hybrids #Hyundai #IBM #MINICountryman #OnStar #Self-drivingVehicles #Uber

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 41 comments

Tandoor on Oct 27, 2016

Many states are like Missouri and have multi-tiered beer distribution. Producers can't distribute or retail. Distributors are a protected monopoly with territories. They have a good racket going with lobbyists and the works. No self driving truck is ever going to deliver beer in Missouri.

Like Reply
Flipper35 on Oct 27, 2016

We don't even let the dealer put their sticker on the car unless they opt to pay us for the advertising. None have agreed to pay us so we have no stickers on the cars.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.
Lynn Joiner Lynn JoinerJust put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?
Lynn Joiner Just put 2,000 miles on a Chevy Malibu rental from Budget, touring around AZ, UT, CO for a month. Ran fine, no problems at all, little 1.7L 4-cylinder just sipped fuel, and the trunk held our large suitcases easily. Yeah, I hated looking up at all the huge FWD trucks blowing by, but the Malibu easily kept up on the 80 mph Interstate in Utah. I expect a new one would be about a third the cost of the big guys. It won't tow your horse trailer, but it'll get you to the store. Why kill it?