Acura MDX Touring Review

Admin
by Admin

The second I saw the Acura MDX, it was déjà vu all over again. Like the recently sampled Honda Pilot, the MDX that landed on my drive was an eight-passenger SUV riding on bisected five-spoke alloys, slathered in Red Rock Pearl paint. Of course, there ARE important differences. Most prominently, the MDX is about 25% more expensive than the Pilot. Which makes the MDX Acura's $10,000 Question: Is the higher-priced SUV that much better than its well-sorted sibling?

Although the Acura MDX is a platform partner with both the Honda Pilot and Honda Odyssey, casual onlookers will scarcely place the MDX on the same family tree, let alone branch. Unlike Ford's chrome-reliant Mercury division, Honda didn't opt for the easy route to affluence. Up front, Acura's designers sanded away the Pilot's bluff prow and pulled the MDX' sheet metal into a beak, complete with projector headlamps book-ending a narrow, wing-shaped grille. They also opted for a more severely raked windshield and sloped backlight. By sacrificing utility for style and aerodynamics in pursuit of a more car-like aesthetic, Acura has done an admirable job avoiding the vehicular "parent trap."

Inside, there's little indication of the MDX's shared origins. The interior is dominated by an instrument panel tastefully-rendered in quality warm-toned plastics and reasonably convincing faux burl wood. LED backlit gauges please day and night, and soft-touch switches govern all the gewgaws expected at this price point. In our 'Touring R&N' model, most all of the usual sybaritic suspects were present and accounted for: rear-seat DVD, power memory seats, XM, Bluetooth, satellite navigation, back-up camera, the works. Gas-discharge headlamps are the option sheet's only glaring omission. And, as in the Pilot, a telescoping steering wheel is notable by its absence.

The MDX' electronic gubbins are controlled by the most intuitive interface extant. Making liberal use of well-designed touchscreen menus, the system rarely leads drivers astray. While the interface facilitates the manipulation of certain higher audio and HVAC functions, it doesn't rule such systems absolutely– let alone require one of those hateful i-Drive style multi-function knobs. Said another way, you can pump-up the dB's and crank-out the BTU's without being reduced to fumbling through layers of GUI.

The MDX's sole powerplant is Honda's familiar aluminum 3.5-liter V6. On a weekend jaunt to Ohio's Amish countryside, the SUV's 265 ponies never failed to make quick work of the two horsepower buggies lurking over every hill. Its well-sorted ride delivered us to Time Warp Country with admirable comportment; saddle leather seats ensuring that our own hides remained fresh at journey's end. Better yet, the clever flat-fold second and third row seats proffered a commendable amount of stowage space… perfect for toting home inadvisable quantities of handcrafted curiosities and untold wheels of cheese.

Sadly, the county's abundance of well-groomed, serpentine tarmac revealed the Acura's inability to satisfy the enthusiastic driver's thirst for pleasure. Make no mistake: the MDX is even more car-like than the already domesticated Pilot. While the MDX's ride and handling was consistently up to snuff, never once failing to negotiate turns with dignity and grace, it simply didn't want to play. There was no goading wail from its dual box-tipped exhausts. No close-cropped seats clamping torsos in place. No sport-oriented rubber facilitating the occasional burst of accelerative exuberance. No meaty steering feel to help guide the beast through the twisties.

If you carry some speed into a corner, the MDX's Vehicle Stability Assist and all-wheel-drive system quickly put the kibosh on any seat-of-the-pants gratification. It's also unfortunate that Honda doesn't offer one of its slick manual transmissions. At least the MDX' five-speed slushbox is as well-behaved as it is in the Pilot, slurring undetectably no matter what the engine load. Although a bit more braking feel would be welcome, the MDX' electronic brakeforce distribution-governed stoppers are both consistent and reliable.

All of which strike as sensible compromises given the legions of soccer moms and cell-toting suburbanites that gravitate towards this type of vehicle. But as with too many of Soichiro's other products, the MDX ultimately slakes rather than excites. Handling limits and general refinement may be ratcheted up few notches from the (already capable) Pilot, but this is a luxo-barge SUV, pure and simple. Well-heeled adrenaline junkies should look elsewhere. But consumers swayed more by accoutrements than acceleration are advised that the comfortable, reliable, smooth-riding MDX correctly answers Acura's $10,000 Question.

Admin
Admin

More by Admin

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Qeorqe Qeorqe on Sep 23, 2006

    Honda's Acura Division designers need help. Call Ford's Land Rover Division designers and hire them away because they'll be needing a job soon. Good think Acura/Honda makes reliable cars because the SUVs from Acura isn't looking too good.

  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
  • Rochester Always loved that wrap-around cockpit interior. The rest of this car, not so much. Between the two, it was always the mid-90's Cougar that caught my attention.
Next