2023 Honda Pilot Trailsport Review – Rugged City Slicker

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Fast Facts

2023 Honda Pilot Trailsport Fast Facts

Powertrain
3.5-liter V6 (285 horsepower @ 6,100 RPM, 262 lb-ft @ 5,000 RPM)
Transmission/Drive-Wheel Layout
10-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Fuel Economy, MPG
18 city / 23 highway / 20 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
Fuel Economy, L/100km
13.0 city / 10.3 highway / 11.8 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$48,350 (U.S.) / $57,450 (Canada)
As-Tested Price
$49,840 (U.S.) / $59,883.50 (Canada)
Prices include $1,095 destination charge in the United States and $2,100 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can’t be directly compared.

How do you make your citified large crossover seem a bit more rugged to appeal to consumers who either spend their weekends playing outdoors or those who plan to play outdoors but never actually do? You play a little dress-up.


That’s what Honda has done with the 2023 Honda Pilot Trailsport. The design is just a tad more rugged than its stablemates, and there is some off-road functionality here, even though very few of these will be taken off the pavement.

Trailsport models are standard with all-wheel drive and gain an additional inch of ground clearance. There are also skid plates and all-terrain tires on the 18-inch wheels, which themselves are meant to better stand up to off-road abuse.

Other package-specific items include an available camera system that’s meant to help drivers navigate trails, unique orange interior stitching, and rubber floor mats. A panoramic sunroof is standard, and Trailsports are available with the Diffused Sky Blue exterior paint job that my test unit had.

Outside of the skid plates, the all-wheel-drive system, the extra ground clearance, and easy-to-clean floormats, there are not a lot of functional off-road features there. Still, I am confident that the Trailsport can get you over some mildly challenging two-track on the way to the canoe launch or campsite. That said, I wouldn’t take one to the local off-road park.

The thing is, it’s not about what this Pilot trim can do, it’s about how buyers will use it. And while you won’t spot many Trailsports rock climbing in Moab, you will see plenty in the carpool lane.

Which is just fine. It’s an overdone critique of vehicles like this that they’re more about appearance than substance. It might annoy us enthusiasts – a freakin’ Pilot with actual off-road chops would be cool, and stand out in this segment – but who are we to judge if some suburban parent springs extra for the Trailsport merely for the badging?

Those who do will get a large crossover that’s plenty pleasant for urban and suburban driving. I didn’t set one inch of the tires off the pavement, and I still returned this Honda with the feeling that it was quite agreeable for daily driving.

You’d think a crossover this size would feel heavy and ponderous, but this one felt generally light on its feet, both in terms of acceleration and handling. The power numbers don’t seem all that impressive – the 3.5-liter V6 puts out 285 horsepower and 262 lb-ft of torque. But that’s enough for most urban commuting. I almost always want more power, especially when there’s a lot of mass to move, but I could live with this output.

The ride is generally acceptable and the handling is typical of Honda – on the sporty side, even in a utility vehicle, with a steering feel that’s generally well-weighted and precise, though occasionally too artificial. The all-terrain tires didn’t seem to add much in the way of tire noise.

The overall dynamic package is more car-like than something this large should be, though the limits of physics mean Honda can only take things so far. What we have here is a Pilot that drives like a crossover tuned for on-road driving, yet with off-road looks. And some trail-ready gear.

It’s roomy, as befits a big crossover, and the cabin is mostly cleanly designed, though as usual a tacked-on infotainment screen annoys, and Honda’s push-button shifter for the 10-speed automatic transmission can be clunky at times. That said, eschewing a traditional shifter for buttons does create additional center-console space.

Standard features included hill-start assist, hill-descent control, heated steering wheel, wireless phone charger, blind-spot information with rear cross-traffic monitoring, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, satellite radio, in-cabin speaker system, tri-zone climate control, heated front seats, second-row captain’s chairs, power tailgate, conversation mirror, front and rear parking sensors, panoramic sunroof, 18-inch wheels, and LED fog lamps.

Advanced driver-aid systems include adaptive cruise control, a collision mitigation braking system, lane-keeping assist, road-departure mitigation, and traffic-jam assist.

The total price was $48,745, with the only option being the Sonic Gray Pearl paint.

I am not sure anyone will select this specific trim with the idea of going off-road – especially since the Pilot is a quite fine vehicle without the off-road fluff. That said, there’s not much in the way of a downside, aside from the additional cost. So if the Pilot tickles your fancy and you actually do spend time in the backwoods, or you just think you will, you won’t go wrong here.

[Images © 2023 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Oct 19, 2023

    Ugly color. The interior looks cheap and a decade old. It is a Honduh so you know it will be tailgating you for miles regardless of how fast you are traveling.

    • Chiefmonkey Chiefmonkey on Oct 31, 2023

      You could pay nearly 50 grand for this or get a BMW X1! To me the choice is obvious.


      As far as ugliness goes I think the Passport is even more egregious.


  • Redapple2 Redapple2 on Oct 20, 2023

    1 ugly color ; agreed.

    2 could have called it a wilderness edition.

    3 more pictures of cabrini green in the spring. No leaves on ground = March photo.

    4 rental chevy traverse got me ~ 28 MPG. expressway.

    • Tim Healey Tim Healey on Oct 20, 2023

      Yes, sometimes it takes a minute before the review gets written. It's still relevant -- 2023s are still on lots. Oh, and Cabrini Green a) is several miles from that spot and b) has been torn down.




  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next