The Polestar 4 Gets Big Power but No Back Window

by Chris Teague

Published: April 18th, 2023

the polestar 4 gets big power but no back window

Though it’s a bit more adventurous and sporty than its parent company, Polestar’s designs haven’t drastically strayed from Volvo’s calming look. That’s changing – albeit slightly – for 2024, with the introduction of the Polestar 4. The coupe-SUV features a concept car look, including a large solid panel where the back window should be.

Polestar offers two powertrains, including a single-motor rear-drive variant with 272 horsepower and a 373-mile range estimate on the WLTP cycle. The dual-motor version delivers 544 horsepower and a range estimate of 348 miles, and Polestar claims a 3.8-second 0-60 mph time. Bi-directional charging is standard, allowing the Polestar 4 to charge other EVs and external power equipment.

The elephant in the room with the exterior design is that Polestar left off the rear window. Instead, the cabin features a high-definition screen that features a wide-view display of the rear of the vehicle. Polestar said the feed could be deactivated to allow the front passenger to see people in the back.

Polestar increased its use of sustainable and recycled materials and said the new upholstery material is made from 100 percent recycled polyester. The carpets were made using recycled plastic, and other plastics incorporate more recycled material instead of introducing new plastic to the manufacturing process. The automaker said it designed the interior with more common base materials to reduce waste.

A 15.4-inch touchscreen comes standard, running on Google’s Android Automotive OS. The update brings Google built-in services, including Maps, Assistant, and the Google Play app store. A 1,400-watt, 12-speaker Harman Kardon sound system is available, and the 4 comes standard with Apple CarPlay.

Polestar retains Volvo’s heavy focus on vehicle safety, and the 4 gets several advanced driver aids. It comes with 12 cameras, a dozen ultrasonic sensors, and interior cameras for driver monitoring. Polestar said it does not collect the interior video, noting that it’s only used to make sure the driver is paying attention.

[Image: Polestar]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Polestar #polestar4 #Volvo

Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 25 comments

Garrett on Apr 20, 2023

The problem with this, or with rearview mirror LCD displays while the car is underway, is physics.

You eye focuses differently when looking at a screen than when looking at images in a mirror. When you take your eyes off the road to look in a mirror, the focal length can stay the same - not so with a screen.

Essentially, you force people to quickly go from distance to near and then back to distance every time they want to see what's behind them. Meanwhile, Millennials are just about to start hitting that age when they have to move their glasses to read a menu.

1 Reply
28-Cars-Later on Jul 18, 2023

Instead of showing you the outside, here is a picture of what's outside. Volvo has really lost it's way as this is in no way safe.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.