Mercedes-AMG Unveils New GLC Coupe

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Yes, we know – news of a crossover with ‘coupe-like’ styling isn’t likely to raise the pulse of many commenters, especially one painted approximately the same color as the pavement on which it is driven. The new GLC Coupe may be a stern German shown in a dour shade of paint, but its 671 horsepower and 752 lb-ft of torque make it anything but boring.


Billed as the brand’s “first performance hybrid SUV coupe”, the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe does cut a handsome if immediately recognizable figure. Appending that five-letter word to its name ensures the thing has a lot more sport than utility thanks to its dramatic roofline which cuts sharply into cargo space compared to a normal GLC. Alert readers will have correctly determined there is some form of electrification under the hood, tipped off by the ‘E Performance’ moniker and the fact that just about everything introduced these days has some measure of juice on board.


In this example, the 63 variant combines a 2.0-liter turbo engine with an electric drive unit on the rear axle. This combo is good for the aforementioned 671 ponies and 752 lb-ft of twist and funnels its power through a nine-speed transmission and 4Matic all-wheel drive. If you care, the engine itself contributes 469 horses and 402 torques to this equation. Score one for its electric drive unit, though it is worth noting that buried in the bumf is a notation the electrified guts make their maximum grunt of 201hp for 10 seconds at a time; its continuous output is 107 horses. In other words, it seems like the GLC 63 S E Performance Coupe will belt out a total of 576 horsepower in most conditions, with the full-fat 671 figure reserved for launches and the like. A lightweight 6.1-kWh battery is located above the rear axle.

An entry-level model called the GLC 43 4Matic Coupe, also powered by a 2.0L four banger, is able to produce 416 horsepower plus an additional 14 ponies via a belt-driven starter generator at lower engine speeds. Like the 63 trim, it gets the nine-speed automatic which deploys a wet starting clutch in place of a torque converter. Merc estimates this model will scamper to 60 mph from rest in about 4.8 seconds while it more powerful brother will run the course in approximately 3.5 ticks of the clock. It is worth mentioning the weight disparity, with the 43 listed at 4,389 pounds while the 63 bends the scales at nearly 5,100 pounds despite both cars setting down identical footprints. Electrified guts tend to be tremendously heavy, after all.


The cabin is typical Mercedes, which is to say stern but comfortable with a duo of enormous screens up front. As with so many models from the brand these days, a landscape tablet sits ahead of the driver serving duty as a gauge cluster while a portrait tablet dominates the center stack as mission control for infotainment. Both can be configured umpteen different ways, with the likes of AMG Track Pace tools and an AMG-exclusive display style on hand so owners can brag to their passengers.

Expect to see these machines in 2024, though the 43 and 63 may end up being different model years.


[Image: Mercedes-Benz]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 26, 2023

    Does this monster above its weight? I am very impressed.

  • El scotto El scotto on Sep 26, 2023

    -channeling my inner Kenneth Mars- It is a coupe because Merzedes say's it est une kupe! Quiet schweinhunds! Dis is zee best kupe in zee vorld! Merzedes says so! Zee best or nothing Mein Herrs!

  • 2ACL My girlfriend currently drives a 2018 SE hatch. Automatic, but I've been handling the fluid services (looking to do another along with the filter soon) and it's been a solid runner for her. My only issue with its dynamics is the transmission's gingerly kick down out of corners (the SEL is the lowest trim that offers manual control functionality IIRC). Otherwise, none of the quirks that've blighted the Powershift's reputation have manifested.A stick would drastically extend its life expectancy. I know she isn't as committed to stick life though, which influenced my approval.
  • MaintenanceCosts GM hasn't put any effort into any Cadillacs except the Blackwings and the electrics. They're getting out what they put in. Pretty simple, really.The XT4/5/6 are all just slightly up-styled versions of Chevy products, but priced as if they were on dedicated luxury platforms like the BMW and Benz competitors to the larger two. The XT6 is especially embarrassing.Even the Escalade is just a Tahoe/Suburban with a few trick design touches and a halfhearted materials upgrade. The good news for Cadillac is that the Tahoe/Suburban are seen as upscale enough that a half-a$s upgrade to them can be a legitimate luxury car.Where's the "gotta have it" factor? Where are the dazzling interior designs? Where's the swagger? Until those show up the brand is just a set of memories.
  • Dwford The problem with Cadillac is that the only Cadillac they sell is the Escalade. Cadillacs are supposed to be large imposing vehicles that are visually impressive. Only the Escalade meets that standard. Everything else Cadillac sells are knock off BMWs. Cadillac shouldn't be in the business of selling compact 4 cylinder crossovers. Dime a dozen vehicles. You'd be better off buying a high trim version of any mainstream crossover than an XT4. Why does a CT4 start at the same price as a Camry XSE? Why do Buicks have nicer interiors than Cadillacs? Why to CHEVYS have nicer interiors than Cadillacs?
  • EBFlex “Insatiable demand” Pretty sad when even the Uber deranged EU doesn’t want EVs.
  • Jbltg Had a rental like this once, stock of course. NYC to Vermont. Very smooth and quiet, amazing fuel economy. Not the best for interior space though. Back seat and trunk barely usable.
Next