Rare Rides Icons: The Lincoln Mark Series Cars, Feeling Continental (Part XLV)

by Corey Lewis

Published: June 30th, 2023

rare rides icons the lincoln mark series cars feeling continental part xlv

In our last Mark VIII installment we explored the continual styling setbacks Lincoln encountered during the development of the Mark VIII’s exterior. Initially slated for a 1990 model year release (one year after Thunderbird and Cougar), the Mark VIII required several rounds of styling revisions that meant its introduction was delayed to the ‘93 model year. Lincoln execs felt great concern when they saw previews of the new Nineties PLC competition, which led them to scrap the idea of a “newer Mark VII” look in favor of a totally different styling direction.

Similar to the stylistic leap forward that occurred when the baroque Mark VI became the blocky Mark VII, the Mark VIII eliminated almost all hard edges and went for a more organic, aerodynamic look. The formerly upright waterfall grille was leaned backward considerably, and shrunken from the almost Georgian facade of the Mark VII. Thin grille vanes were closer together and uniform in their distribution with a single thicker vane in the middle.

For the first time in the model’s long and illustrious history, there was no hood ornament above the grille. Nor was there any rectangular Mark badge to indicate its number. Both those features were replaced by a centrally-mounted Lincoln logo in the grille, with a red background. Atop the grille, a thick chrome strip ran the full width of the hood and formed the border of the headlamps and corner markers. The trim served to draw the front end into cohesion and added a sleek, Wide-Track look.

Wide rectangular headlamps flanked either side of the grille and transitioned into sharp corner markers. The following year, Chrysler would debut a fairly similar front end on the new full-size LHS. Underneath the striking lamps was a fully integrated bumper. Another first in the Mark’s design, there was no rectangular chrome shelf sticking out in front of the grille. The bumper was always finished in body color and contained a thin strip of chrome that wrapped around the front end and paused in the middle to accommodate the lower portion of the grille design.

The firsts continued as the extended wheelbase pushed wheels closer to the Mark VIII’s corners, and made for a more aggressive stance with much less overhang front and rear. Wheel wells went without chrome outlines for the first time on any Mark. In its efforts toward Ultra Smooth Styling, the Mark VIII lost its wheel arch bulges: The surface area around the arch was flush with the body. Underneath those smooth semicircles, tires wore a polished lace alloy design, and (in another first) there were no wheel covers on offer.

The smooth hood lacked a defined power bulge and flowed to a fender devoid of a firm character line. The upper character line was only a suggestion - part of the organic shape that made up the side profile of the Mark VIII. The Mark VII’s thick band of lower chrome was thinned, refined, and moved almost to the middle of the door. It was set into a body-colored door rub strip that ran from the front of the door to the rear wheel.

Above, heavy chrome dogleg door handles of the past were replaced by a body-colored design borrowed from the Taurus-based Continental that debuted in 1988. Similarly stripped of chrome was the door mirror, which hugged close to the A-pillar and was less square than on the Mark VII. The mirrors neatly matched the shape of the overall side glass, which was sportier than before.

A faster A-pillar and smaller door glass were paired with a B-pillar about the same size as the Mark VII, but a curved rear side window was much less formal than on Mark VII.

The C-pillar was also less formal, and much thinner on the Mark VIII. It went without any Lincoln badging and flowed down onto the rear fender and formed part of the surround for the very large rear window. Mark VIII’s organic shape meant there was no real place to put the expected vertical tail lamps, so lighting was horizontal instead.

Mimicking the general shape of the front lighting cluster, a full-width lighted heckblende spanned the back of the Mark VIII. Its top edge wore a thin chrome strip and sprouted a Lincoln logo right in the middle. Lamps were notable in how they wrapped around the rear and took up a large portion of the fender’s real estate in addition to the trunk lid.

Reduced to its most minimal design ever was the traditionalist Continental tire hump. Molded into the smooth lines of the rear deck, it was sort of out of place and was nowhere near the shape of an actual car tire like it was on the Mark VII. Similarly minimal was the rear’s chrome trim, which picked up after the rear wheel and wrapped around to the other side. Mark VIII’s bumper stuck out notably at the rear, and its size made for a high liftover into the trunk.

In contrast to the Mark VII, Mark VIII moved the license plate back into the bumper area. Roughly the same position it last occupied on the Mark VI, Mark VIII’s rear end was more cohesive and less cluttered than the Mark VII. It’s easy to think how the Mark VII’s design would have benefitted from a lower rear license plate location.

As the Mark VIII brushed aside most traditions for a futuristic look, its interior also looked to the future. Swooping angles replaced an upright conservative dash design, and the Mark VIII sported a driver-focused cockpit well beyond the design used in the Mark VII. We’ll pick it up there next time.

[Images: Dealer]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#Ttac #NewsBlog #Features #RareRides #RareRidesIcons #Ford #Lincoln #Mercury #LincolnMarkVIII #Continental #LincolnContinental #1990s #PLC #PersonalLuxuryCoupe #Thunderbird #Cougar

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 20 comments

SPPPP on Jul 01, 2023

I do like certain aspects of this design, though I preferred the MN12 Thunderbird SC's design as a whole. I think my favorite part is the smooth trunklid, actually.

Like Reply
Sta65728261 on Jul 01, 2023

Looks like a land shark

1 Reply
- 28-Cars-Later on Jul 05, 2023
  
  Needs moar fin.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.