Rare Rides Icons: The Cadillac Eldorado, Distinctly Luxurious (Part XV)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis


Last week in our Cadillac Eldorado saga, we covered the visual updates in the new-for-’57 Eldorado Biarritz. Part of a styling revision across the line at Cadillac that year, the Eldorado in particular drifted away from the bulbous fenders and tall hood shapes that were a hallmark of post-WWII American car design. But there were two more Eldorados in 1957! One of them looked more daring than the Biarritz, and the other looked almost like it was from the past.


(Note: The red example is the '57 Eldorado Seville, blue is a '56 Eldorado Seville, and the black four-door is a '57 Eldorado Brougham.)


The most daring Eldorado in 1957 was the hardtop Seville. An add-on model in the prior generation in 1956, Seville found itself immediately more popular than the convertible. Whether that popularity was down to its practicality, a stylish hardtop roofline, or something else, Seville would be a permanent member of the Eldorado family.

In 1957 the front end of the Eldorado Seville adopted an identical look to the Biarritz. The lower and smoother hood, revised egg crate grille and smaller rubber-tipped Dagmars, quad driving lamps, it was all there. The only way to tell a Seville from Biarritz in the front third of the car was to check for the golden Seville badging at the front edge of the fender. 

Like the Biarritz, Seville also adopted a less is more attitude with body side trim. It also shared the same rear fenders, fender trim, fins, and rear end design as the convertible. Visual differences between Biarritz and Seville occurred almost exclusively in the middle of the car, and it was a big departure from 1956.


The Biarritz roofline did not change all that much in the translation to a new generation in 1957. However, Seville diverged here and opted for a B-pillar that was canted rearward like most other Cadillacs that year. The windshield had a gentler angle and was wrapped around further into the door in 1957, just like the Biarritz.

The two cars did not share a lower window line. The Seville’s angled downward before kicking up suddenly to meet the downward slope of the roofline as it headed past the door. Joined together, the two angles mimicked the B-pillar as it angled toward the trunk. Like the Biarritz, Seville lost its ribbed saddle trim along the window. It further served to highlight how the Biarritz used the same side window line of 1956, while the Seville didn’t.

The Seville’s shape made for a large rear window that was almost as curvy as the windshield. In between those two panes of glass there was not a pillar to be found; the only interruption was from the adjustable vent window. This styling update lent the Seville a sportier image than the Biarritz, and made it look newer. Only so many shapes could be formed when restricted by the canvas top of the convertible.

In contrast to the advancement of the ‘57 Seville was the Series 70 Eldorado Brougham. Though the super expensive and hand-built car was an epitome moment for Cadillac at the time, its styling was clearly dictated before the brand knew what 1957 models would look like. Keen observation highlights lots of leftover styling cues from the first half of the decade.

One detail that was important to customers and certainly not a leftover were the headlamps. All 1957 Eldorado Broughams came with quad headlamps as standard. It’s unclear whether that was a result of them arriving later in the model year (as all states approved quad lamps in 1958), or if Cadillac just didn’t sell any in states where quad lamps were not yet legal.


The rest of the front end was a mix of details old and new. The egg crate grille and Dagmars were straight off the other ‘57 Eldorados, but driving lamps were square and of the 1956 persuasion. There were some bullseye-style chrome details beneath the headlamps that almost looked like working lights, but were purely for decoration. 

In the middle of the hood the Brougham wore exclusive Eldorado block lettering, and was the only Cadillac that year to skip a crest on its hood. There was a crest behind the front tire on the fender, another indication of its early design date: The rest of the brand already abandoned that placement. Beginning at the corner of the headlamps and heading down the front fender there was a chrome trim strip underneath the company’s 1950s character line. 


The chrome was slightly higher on the body than the typical Fifties Cadillac, but for a particular reason. It extended down the front and rear doors and curved downward into the sort of vent detail seen on the brand’s models between 1950 and 1956. But again that was a throwback, as side vent details had vanished from the rest of the lineup.

Unique to the Eldorado Brougham was its door arrangement, as it featured coach doors. At the sedan’s lower edge was a chrome trim strip that began at the front wheel arch. It expanded at the vent detailing and covered the lower fender. The trim also wrapped underneath, and extended all the way to the rear. That made the Brougham look sort of similar to the other ‘57 Eldorados.


The rear-hinged coach doors might’ve been something special (and perhaps complicated) if they worked with the company’s new roofline. However, the Eldorado Brougham used the 1956 and earlier roof, where the B-pillar leaned forward and was joined by a less aggressive wrap-around rear window. Heading further aft were the Brougham’s fins, which look as though they were a copy paste from the 1956 Eldorado.

Far from the regular Eldorado’s rear fender line that angled downward, the Brougham was more akin to the Series 75 sedan. It maintained some rear fender similarity with the other new Eldorados by skipping the rounded pod that bulged out below the fin to hold the rear lamps. Instead, the Brougham’s rear lamps were contained within the fin, a nice piece of design. 


The bumper contained exhaust outlets at either corner which stuck out via their own large extensions, sort of like the ‘56 Eldorado. The bumper was separated into two sections like current Eldorado design, and contained the dual reversing lamps and an additional red lamp. Unlike Eldorado which had its fuel filler door at the left rear fender, Brougham located it next to the trunk lid where it would usually be concealed by the fin. 


That meant the fender area was metal sans interruption. Wheels looked smooth too, as the exclusive Brougham rode on a set of turbine alloys that were more aggressive and better looking than the multi-vane chromes available on other Cadillacs. In our next installment we’ll take a look at the interior differences and modernizations implemented on the 1957 Eldorado. 


[Images: seller, seller, seller]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Feb 03, 2024

    I have 57 Eldorado Brougham in my collection (made in China).

  • Ras815 Ras815 on Feb 04, 2024

    Just to put things into perspective: a hand-built '57 Brougham retailed for around $13,300. A new Rolls-Royce at the time would have cost around $13k. Enough said.

    • Jeff Jeff on Feb 04, 2024

      That was when Cadillac was truly the Standard of the World.


  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next