Junkyard Find: 1988 Volvo 740 GLE with 403,348 miles

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Volvo sold brick-shaped rear-wheel-drive station wagons in North America beginning in 1968 with the 145 and continuing through the final V90s three decades later. The 700 Series wagons showed up just about in the middle of that era, but tend to be overshadowed by their 245 predecessors today. Today we'll honor the 740 longroof by admiring one that drove past the 400k-mile mark during its career.

This isn't the highest-mile Volvo 740 wagon I've ever found in a car graveyard. That honor belongs to a 1990 740 Turbo wagon with 493,549 miles, spotted at the Oakland Pick-n-Pull back in 2020.

The highest-mile discarded Volvo I've ever documented was a 1990 240 sedan in Colorado with 631,999 miles. After that comes the aforementioned 493k-mile 740 Turbo wagon and then today's steel Swede in the number 3 spot.

Then there's a whole bunch of junked 240s with odometers showing between 300,411 and 393,888 miles, all found in Colorado or California.

I found this wagon in the Pull-a-Part in Charlotte, North Carolina, which I visited on the way to work at the 24 Hours of Lemons race in South Carolina.

I also stopped at the Pull-a-Part in Columbia, South Carolina, later that day. That yard produced a radical reshuffling of the Murilee Martin Junkyard Odometer standings, because it was there that I found a 1996 Toyota Avalon boasting a (Carfax-verified) 949,863-mile final reading on its odometer.

That car knocked the 1990 Volvo 240 out of the top spot by more than 300,000 miles, giving Toyota a second Top Ten car (along with a 583k-mile Camry wagon that rolled off the Georgetown line a month prior to the well-traveled Avalon).

For those of you keeping score, here's the current MMJO Top Ten, which includes three cars built in the United States (the Toyotas and the Nissan), three built in West Germany, two built in Japan and two built in Sweden:

  1. 1996 Toyota Avalon: 949,863 miles
  2. 1990 Volvo 244: 631,999 miles
  3. 1988 Honda Accord: 626,476 miles
  4. 1987 Mercedes-Benz W201: 601,173 miles
  5. 1996 Toyota Camry wagon: 583,624 miles
  6. 1981 Mercedes-Benz W126: 572,139 miles
  7. 1985 Mercedes-Benz W126: 525,971 miles
  8. 1988 Honda Accord: 513,519 miles
  9. 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo wagon: 493,549 miles
  10. 1990 Nissan Sentra: 440,299 miles

Today's Junkyard Find is in 22nd place overall, between a Honda CR-V and a Nissan Stanza.

The Volvo 700 Series was born with the 760 sedan in 1982, with that car first showing up in the United States as a 1983 model. The more affordable four-cylinder 740 appeared here as a 1985 model, and a wagon version arrived in showrooms late in the model year.

The 700 Series was supposed to replace the 200 Series, but things didn't work out that way. Instead, the final year for the 740 was 1992, while its more primitive but much-beloved ancestor stayed in production through 1993.

To be fair to the 700 Series, its 900 Series successor was a 700 under the skin, and that car stayed in production long enough to get within shouting distance of the 21st century.

This car has a naturally-aspirated 2.3-liter SOHC straight-four engine, rated at 114 horsepower and 136 pound-feet.

This one has the four-speed automatic transmission, which meant its MSRP was $23,570 ($63,627 in 2024 dollars). Meanwhile, American Volvo shoppers in 1988 could buy a new 240 DL wagon with the same powertrain for $17,620 ($47,565 after inflation).

This car looks rough in its current condition, but that's because junkyard shoppers have been yanking parts off it for a while. The body and interior look to have been in good shape upon arrival at Pull-A-Part, and the original owner's manuals are still inside.

You don't get to 400,000 miles by abusing and/or neglecting a car, and this one's owner or owners treated it well for many years.

It may have been a running trade-in that proved impossible to sell due to the scary numbers on the odometer. We'll never know.

If you're going to spend a lot of money on a new car, don't get a Toyota or Buick. Get a Volvo 740!

Volvo USA pushed the turbocharged version of the 740 wagon hard during the late 1980s.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

1988 Volvo 740 GLE wagon in North Carolina junkyard.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Apr 29, 2024

    Really enjoy seeing these loyal survivors. The listing seems to prove the adage that the person who owns the car is more important than the make or model of the car when it comes to long term service/reliability.

  • Spamvw Spamvw on Apr 29, 2024

    Nice to know I've broken into the top 10.


    478000 yesterday, but it's digital odo so there will no pics when it goes to it's final resting place.


    As I've said before, since the computer brain reads in KM's it will stop at roughly 620k.


    I've been told that there are VW folks who can reset it. But I'm guessing rust will take the unibody by then.


    Sam

    '02 TDI Jetta Wagon (grey) (manual)



  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next