Chrysler Going Electric By 2028, Airflow EV Introduced

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Stellantis has announced plans to shift the Chrysler brand to an all-electric lineup by 2028, presumably because it doesn’t know what else to do with it anymore. Though, considering the make’s long and storied history, the change almost seems fitting.

When the French bought up Fiat Chrysler Automobiles from the Italians in 2021, the namesake brand had already been losing steam under the Germans. But they were adopting the company after years of mismanagement from Americans, who had taken the marque from being arguably the most luxurious and technologically advanced the United States had to one that had to be saved from bankruptcy by government intervention on more than one occasion. Suffice it to say, Chrysler has enjoyed some of the sweetest highs and pathetic lows imaginable. But it always seems to rise from the ashes thanks to some innovative decision that ultimately helps redefine the industry — which is why Stellantis is leading its own EV offensive by reviving the Airflow name.

Introduced by the Chrysler Corporation in 1934, the Airflow represented a technological leap forward for automotive manufacturing by being among the first vehicles to incorporate air resistance in its design. Sadly, the resulting bodywork left the model and its DeSoto twin less-than popular with motorists of the day. But the groundwork had been laid for the industry and the technology-focused nature that defined the Chrysler brand for the next few decades.

Obviously, that couldn’t last forever and the overriding corporate structure found itself hemorrhaging cash throughout the late 1970s. But new, easy to produce and compact designs began emerging (sometimes with motors on loan from Mitsubishi) to cater to the needs of the day. By the 1980s, the business has a rosier outlook and was introducing entirely new and very successful body styles via the Dodge Caravan and Plymouth Voyager minivans.

Since then, the manufacturing group has gone through numerous name changes and a host of foreign investors. Some years have been good, while others were exceptionally bad. But the one constant has been the dwindling market share of the standalone Chrysler brand. Its annual sales for the U.S. market went from 641,406 in 2006 (under Daimler-Chrysler) to just 110,285 in 2020 (under FCA). When PSA Group bought the company to form Stellantis, Chrysler was little more than a purveyor of luxury minivans and the classier alternative to Dodge’s Charger thrown in as part of the deal to get ahold of Jeep.

Leadership is now tapping the Chrysler name to spearhead electrification while it decides how to best modernize the rest of its properties. Frankly, I’m less than enthusiastic about Dodge abandoning V8 powertrains for turbocharged V6s and nearly cried when the venerable Caravan was discontinued in 2020. But transitioning Chrysler over to EVs hasn’t gotten my Mopar-embroidered panties in a twist, likely due to its already spartan lineup and prolonged history of rolling with the punches. Besides, if there was ever an automaker that needed some reinvention and deserved a second chance — it’s this one.

While the Airflow has not been confirmed for production, Chrysler CEO Christine Feuell indicated that the concept was a physical acknowledgment of what Stellantis has planned for the brand moving forward. The first official EV on the production docket is an (as of yet) unnamed crossover in 2025, with a planned all-electric minivan and at least one other vehicle taking the stage by 2028.

“When we sought to redefine and revitalize the Chrysler brand, we needed to make sure that we were creating differentiation within the Stellantis portfolio as well as compared to competition,” she told CNBC during a virtual interview held ahead of CES 2022. “We will be adding one new product per year once we launch our first new product … and expanding that lineup between then and 2028.”

“[Technology] is so important with what consumers are looking for in terms of that seamless connectivity and integrating their personal digital life with their mobile digital life,” Feuell continued. “[The goal is to make] that easy and intuitive with the ability to personalize every space within the vehicle regardless of whether it’s a driver or a passenger.”

That presumably means adopting all of the double-edged connectivity features other manufacturers are leaning into. As things currently stand, it’s actually harder for automakers to make money on EVs that lack exceptionally high price tags without sizable government-backed incentives. However, industry trends and government intervention are effectively forcing electrification at an inorganic pace. One solution to this conundrum — made easier by the digitization of automobiles — is to offer subscription-based features, services, and customization using the preeminently embedded internet. We gripe about the related privacy concerns and the potential for disgustingly predatory business tactics all the time. But there remains an opportunity for the industry to make money from it and companies cannot wait to see how their implementation plays out.

For better or worse, the Chrysler Airflow concept also has all the hallmarks of a modern connected EV. The interior is dominated by large screens encompassing the entirety of the dashboard, the grille lights up unnecessarily, and it uses the latest AI-supported software (STLA SmartCockpit) Stellantis has at its disposal.

Visually, the crossover is a conglomerate of the Chrysler Pacifica, Lincoln Corsair, and Tesla Model X — resulting in some handsome, but ultimately derivative, minimalism. We’re hoping the subsequent production model keeps the Airflow name while taking a few liberties with the concept’s bodywork. On the upside, Stellantis has said that both should boast all-electric ranges somewhere between 350 and 400 miles on a single charge.

But this will be a win only if the prospective model can undercut the typically lofty MSRPs associated with luxury EVs without sacrificing comfort or features. For now, leadership has only confirmed that it doesn’t want any of its electrified models straying far from the “sweet spot,” which CEO Feuell identified as between $35,000 and $60,000.

In the interim, we’ve heard plans that Chrysler will end production of the 300 sedan by the end of 2023 — leaving a massive hole in its already svelte lineup. The Airflow (or whatever name they end up using) is assumed to fill the void in the summer of 2024 after the Belvidere plant in Illinois has been retooled. Though this is speculative, with our having no way of determining how much of Stellantis’ $35.5 billion electric vehicle investment will be going toward the project.

[Images: Stellantis]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 43 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 06, 2022

    "if there was ever an automaker that needed some reinvention and deserved a second chance — it’s this one" Whoa, hold up a second - a blanket statement like this is going to need some justification. (Or at least a QOTD if we still did those which I suppose we don't and by we I mean you and by you I mean the collective you but not Soviet style collective)

  • Watersketch Watersketch on Jan 06, 2022

    What about an EV minivan? Chrysler is still close to owning the minivan space. Nobody has a mini EV van unless you count the Transit. The PHEV Pacifica is not great from the owners I know. If you want to be cute you can call it the minEVan.

    • See 1 previous
    • RHD RHD on Jan 12, 2022

      Watersketch, you are right on the money. A minivan that recharges to 100% overnight and never needs gas, is quiet, spacious and hopefully has some inspired styling would be an excellent family vehicle. Its success would be entirely based on getting suburban moms with fancy fingernails, highlighted hair and oversized eyelashes to think it's cool.

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next