2021 Acura TLX SH-AWD Advance Review - Sleek, Yet Flawed, Sport

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2021 Acura TLX SH-AWD Advance Fast Facts

2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (272 horsepower @ 6,500 rpm; 280 lb-ft @ 1,600-4,500 rpm)
Ten-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
21 city / 29 highway / 24 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
11.3 city, 8.1 highway, 9.8 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$48,300 (U.S) / $46,505 (Canada)
As Tested
$49,325 (U.S.) / $46,505 (Canada)
Prices include $1,025 destination charge in the United States and $2,175 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

Mid-size luxury sport sedans sometimes come up short when it comes to the sport part of the equation. Acura’s TLX, for the most part, does not.

Yeah, I know, I just gave away my conclusion upfront, thus violating a basic guideline of writing a review. Stick around to find out why I came to that conclusion after the local press fleet tossed me the keys all those months ago (hence the snow).

The biggest reason the TLX mostly succeeds as a sport sedan – luxury or not – is that Acura has imbued it with lively handling, at least up to a point. Push too hard and you’ll get reminded that this version isn’t the Type S, and that there are compromises involved when luxury ladled on. In this case, it results in tire-squealing understeer and body roll.

Still, you’ll have fun before you reach that point, thanks to steering that’s relatively lively and accurate – though still imbued with some of the artificial feel that plagues most modern cars using electronic systems.

A new double-wishbone front suspension surely helps, along with a five-link rear setup. My test car’s Advance Package also included adaptive dampers. It also had Acura’s SH-AWD all-wheel-drive system, which includes a rear stabilizer bar that’s 0.5 mm larger than the one on front-drive cars.

Underhood is a 2.0-liter turbo-four that makes 272 horsepower and 280 lb-ft of torque. The turbo four has plenty of grunt for merging and passing, though the car feels a tad heavy. Putting the car in sport mode seemed to give the car a boost – and it also made the handling a tad better, though it was still possible to reach the limit without too much effort. The transmission here is a 10-speed automatic.

As befits a luxury sport sedan, the ride isn’t sacrificed at the altar of handling. It’s pleasantly compliant with minimal softness.

The TLX may be fun to drive – again, up to a point – but it’s not without flaws. The front passenger area felt roomy and spacious, but the rear seats felt tight. As already noted, the car feels in need of a diet. The interior materials look good, though some feel cheap. I actually had to confirm with Acura that the wood in the cabin was real, as it didn’t feel that way.

The biggest con involving this car is the confounding touchpad infotainment-system controller. It requires a bit too much of a learning curve, and it’s almost as bad as what Lexus has served up in recent years. Maybe I’d feel better about it if I owned the car and got used to it over time.

I also took issue with panel gaps that looked a tad too wide to the naked eye (see below).

Standard features include LED headlights and taillights, 19-inch wheels, leather seats, heated front seats, Bluetooth, Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, satellite radio, dual-zone climate control, keyless entry and starting, and a power moonroof. The Tech package added nav, blind-spot monitor, rear cross-traffic alert, and parking sensors. The Advance package adds the adaptive dampers, a 360-degree camera, LED fog lights, cooled front seats, heated rear seats, heated steering wheel, head-up display, premium audio, and wireless phone charger.

AcuraWatch is the name for the driver-aid suite, and here it includes adaptive cruise control, collision-mitigation braking, forward-collision warning, lane-departure warning, lane-keeping assist, road-departure mitigation, and traffic-jam assist.

That’s all for $48,300. Add the $1,025 destination fee and it’s $49,325.

The EPA lists fuel economy at 21/29/24.

The TLX makes for an all-around package that offers up a decent amount of driving excitement, within reason, while not sacrificing much in the way of comfort. If only the infotainment controls weren’t so annoying, and if the rear seat was a skoosh bigger. Still, if you have a budget for a luxury sedan and want to spice it up once in a while, the TLX deserves a look.

[Images © 2021 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • Daniel J Daniel J on Sep 21, 2021

    I just don't see the interior being 14k more than my Mazda 6 grand touring reserve.

  • AK AK on Sep 21, 2021

    Not much of a review and even less of a photo shoot. Since the comments are carrying this post, I guess I'll add that the thought of spending over 40k for this TLX is depressing. Looking at a base TLX (the only one I'd consider paying for), all you're getting over an Accord is exterior style (debatable), better seats and less road noise. That's not worth 7k to me.

  • SCE to AUX Introduce a modern V-16 and put it into a Celestiq-like vehicle instead of electric.
  • DungBeetle62 For where we're at in the product cycle, I think there are bigger changes afoot. With this generation debuting in 2018, and the Avalon gone, is the next ES to be Crown based? That'll be an interesting aesthetic leap.
  • Philip Precht When Cadillac stopped building luxury cars, with luxury looks, that is when they started their downward spiral. Now, they just look like Chevrolet knock-offs, not much luxury, no luxurious looks. Interiors are just generic. Nothing what they used to look like. Why should someone spend $80,000 on a Cadillac when they can spend a LOT less and get a comparable looking Chevrolet????
  • Ajla A time machine.
  • 28-Cars-Later This question has been posed many times and we discussed it in depth around the time of the ATS and JdN. Then GM had 933 dealers left over from its glory days and ATS was intended to be volume lease fodder for all of those dealer customers. But of course the problem there is channel stuffed junk worked against the image they ostensibly were trying to create when they threatened products like Escala (and the image they thought they were creating with ELR). Cadillac had two choices in my view at the time, either drop 2/3rds of the dealers and focus on truly bespoke low volume product or abandon the pretense of exclusive/bespoke and build high volume models as they had essentially been doing since the last 1960s. Ten years on the choice they made was obvious, hence XT everything... XT an acronym for Xerox This when pointing at Chevrolets and Buicks.There's no "saving" a marque which doesn't wish to be saved. In the next major financial crisis Buick may be folded or consolidated into Chevrolet but Cadiwrack will just become a wrapper over whatever Chinesium infused junk the new openly owner/controlled SAIC GM wants it to be. Cadillac been gone for a long, long time.
Next