2021 Nissan Kicks Receives Minimal But Appreciated Updates

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Released in tandem with a series of meaningful updates to the gargantuan Armada, Nissan has decided to give the subcompact Kicks a few embellishments of its own for the 2021 model year. While not nearly as comprehensive as its three-row sibling, the updates similarly build upon the existing platform by making small changes customers were undoubtedly harping upon.

Outside, the refreshed Kicks gets a new grille, fog lamps, tail lamps, updated bumpers, and some optional LED headlights. The combination makes the model look like a baby Rogue and brings it in line with Nissan’s current design language. There are also some novel paint options with the manufacturer likewise allowing customers to order two-tone schemes with a black roof.

While hardly the first to implement dueling exterior hues, it’s nice to see the company playing into one of the segment’s more interesting trends. We wouldn’t mind seeing two-tone paint offered on more models, provided it’s done well. The Kicks also allows customers to colorize numerous components on the interior and exterior, allowing for quite a bit of visual customization.

There’s a bit less being done to the interior, though we’d imagine these changes are the ones drivers will appreciate most. Nissan has widened the armrest so it can be used by the driver or front passenger, revamped the center console (with more USB ports), swapped out some of the vents, and made some changes to the upholstery options. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are now standard across the board as well, with a bigger 8-inch touchscreen becoming optional for some of the nicer trims. A Wi-Fi hot spot can also be had, along with keyless entry (with remote start) and a Bose premium sound system.

But the trim levels aren’t changing, nor have there been any big changes to its electronic safety suite. Nissan will continue offering the Kicks in S, SV, and SR flavors — with the latter having a premium version that defaults to the fancier options. And the default safety features still include front and rear automatic emergency braking, lane departure warnings, rear cross-traffic alerts, high-beam assist, and blind-spot warning.

Mechanical components also haven’t changed. The little crossover still has the 1.6-liter engine producing 122 horsepower and 114 pounds-feet of torque as standard equipment. While we almost expected to see all-wheel drive making an appearance, Nissan has opted to keep the Kicks exclusively front-wheel drive and has retained its continuously variable transmission.

Despite doing little for the car’s dynamics, it does allow it to retain its agreeable fuel economy figures of 31/36 mpg (city/highway).

Pricing has yet to be announced but we’ll find out before the 2021 Kicks goes on-sale date of February. We don’t anticipate the model straying from its current sticker, however. $19,000 to start sounds about right.

[Images: Nissan]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • JLGOLDEN JLGOLDEN on Dec 10, 2020

    Just for fun, I rented a 2020 Kicks earlier this year. The cheap-n-cheerful vibe resonated so well that I traded a (disappointing) 2020 Forester Touring for TWO new Kicks, both loaded SR models. The dealer made a great deal, as they seemingly wanted that Forester. With congested city life as the daily norm, Nissan's surround-view camera system has won me over. I cannot imagine owning another car without this safety feature. Also, Nissan's Zero-Gravity seats have been a blessing to my back and thighs. We are never fatigued, even after hours on the road. For basic and economical transport, both Nissan Kicks and Versa are pleasant options. Note: I would have considered a Hyundai Venue, but there were none available for rental, and I need a full weekend of driving to evaluate a car.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Dec 10, 2020

      Your comments are as good as any road review I've read. The SR trim really is a meaningful improvement for small price adder.

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Dec 10, 2020

    From a looks standpoint, I don't hate it, but I haven't driven anything will less than 145 horsepower since my Escort, and that wasn't pretending to be a crossover. It still looks a bit like Cletus and the family with that grille.

  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
Next