2020 Mini Cooper S Countryman Review - A Hatchback From Costco

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2020 Mini Cooper S Countryman

2.0-liter inline four, turbocharged (189 hp @ 5000 rpm, 207 lb/ft. @ 1350 rpm)
Seven-speed dual-clutch transmission, front-wheel drive
24 city / 33 highway / 28 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
29.1 (observed mileage, MPG)
Base Price: $32,750US
As Tested: $42,250 US
Prices include $850 destination charge in the United States.

Considering the insanity our consumer markets have seen over the past few weeks, I’m kicking myself for having let my warehouse club membership lapse a year or so ago. I reasoned that there was absolutely no need for me to buy staple foods (or paper products) in bulk quantities. There would be no circumstance short of the apocalypse where my regular supermarket could not adequately fill the needs of my family.

Yeah, I’m kicking myself.

Anyhow, that got me thinking about other things that one could buy in larger packages than normal. Looking at the photos of the 2020 Mini Cooper S Countryman I drove a few weeks ago, it clicked – this is the bulk package Mini Cooper. A fair bit more Mini than the standard three-door hatchback, the Countryman is the Mini for families.

To be fair, I wouldn’t take any Mini on a serious Costco run. Those bulk packages of bog roll, frozen ground beef, and fifty-pound bags of flour and rice will quickly overwhelm the 47.6 cubic feet of cargo space the Mini Countryman provides with the rear seats folded. With those rear seats up, 17.6 cubes is a bit tight, but for those weekly supermarket runs this manages perfectly fine.

[Get new and used Mini Countryman pricing here!]

The interior, beyond that tight cargo hold, works beautifully – and is very nicely appointed, with plush quilted leather in an attractive shade of taupe that Mini calls British Oak. The seats offer plenty of support front and rear. My kids, having suffered a bit in the rear of a more traditional two-door Mini Cooper, were amazed at the space they had in the Countryman. Heck, I sat “behind” myself and felt much more comfortable than I do in most compact crossovers – so much so, that this vehicle might genuinely work well for four adults even over long distances. I’m genuinely impressed by the appearance of this interior, as it all looks and feels much more upmarket from the Mini I reviewed last month.

Of course, choosing this leather over the base leatherette requires – at least – the $2,000 Signature Upholstery package and the Signature trim, which adds $3,000 atop the base $28,400 Classic trim level. My tester wears the Iconic trim package, which appears on the sticker as a $8,000 option. Sadly, Mini suffers from parent BMW’s option bloat, where common options require adding more and more to the bottom line. Theoretically, a Countryman could be had for under $30k. This one stickers for $42,250.

While the interior looks great, I’m not as enamored with the exterior styling. Mini has a built-in limitation to its styling, I’m afraid, and trying to enlarge the same old design to fit new market segments makes for weird appendages and bulges. My biggest gripe is with the transition of the roof line between the C- and D-pillars, where the white roof curves down a bit to meet a rear light that is shorter than the windows in both doors. The silver-painted roof rails distract a bit, but my eyes return to that unfortunate roof line.

Thankfully, the driving experience redeems the styling miscues. The Cooper S Countryman is surprisingly engaging behind the wheel. It’s a bit heavy (3,514 pounds), with only 189 horsepower to pull it around, but the steering is direct and eager. The seven-speed dual-clutch transmission shifts quickly and nearly imperceptibly. With the longer wheelbase over the standard Mini, the ride on the interstate is quite good, without the fore-and-aft pitching one finds in the smaller car. Fuel economy is rather good, too — I’m sure I could have broken 30 mpg had I spent a bit more time at freeway speeds. It’s incredibly easy to live with.

Mini calls this Countryman a SAV – a sport-activity vehicle, as opposed to a SUV or crossover CUV. While I struggle with the idea of a Mini not being so, you know, mini – I’m wondering if I’m looking at this all wrong. Is the Countryman actually the crossover that we, the crossover-hating enthusiasts, have been wanting all along?

After all, it’s pretty decent to drive. A bit more power would always be welcome, but the Mini Cooper S Countryman is reasonably fun while retaining a fair bit of utility. Interior space and cargo room is on par with most compact crossovers. And, unlike when buying in bulk elsewhere, you don’t need to pay extra for a membership.

[Images: © 2020 Chris Tonn/TTAC]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • Scuzimi Scuzimi on Mar 31, 2020

    UGH...! I've owned 3 MINI's. A 2002 MCS, a POS, a 2003 Cooper, ,meh and a 2004 MINI Cooper S, a great car. Owned it until 2012. After 2006 I found not many MINI's that I would buy but in 2012 I nearly bought a 2011 Countryman S John Cooper Works but instead I bought an Abarth. I have since owned 3 Fiats... The 2012 Abarth, a Fiat 500 X, totaled it and now a Fiat Renegade Jeep. I hear all the bad stories about them but I've had very few problems and what there were were fixed by the dealership. For me I find it sad at what has become of the brand.

  • DownUnder2014 DownUnder2014 on Apr 17, 2020

    Looks nice but the BMW pricing of options is a slight downer...

  • Oberkanone How long do I have to stay in this job before I get a golden parachute?I'd lower the price of the V-Series models. Improve the quality of interiors across the entire line. I'd add a sedan larger then CT5. I'd require a financial review of Celestiq. If it's not a profit center it's gone. Styling updates in the vision of the XLR to existing models. 2+2 sports coupe woutd be added. Performance in the class of AMG GT and Porsche 911 at a price just under $100k. EV models would NOT be subsidized by ICE revenue.
  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Next