Beyond Adventure: Toyota's RAV4 - Yes, the RAV4 - Gets the TRD Treatment

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

After last year’s Camry and Avalon surprise, it should come as no shock that Toyota’s keen to expand TRD branding beyond its body-on-frame trucks and SUVs. Frankly, the automaker ran out of BOF vehicles to tune for the trail.

Enter the RAV4, redesigned for 2019 and still no one’s idea of a hardcore off-roader. While that impression may be valid, Toyota’s at least making an effort to turn up the brawn on the family-friendly crossover.

Would this derisively nicknamed “soccer mom-mobile” have any hope of delivering a Uruguayan rugby team to safety after a perilous journey through the Andes? Doubtful, regardless of the impressive (and suggestive) backdrop seen in Toyota’s press images.

Entering the scene as a 2020 model, the RAV4 TRD Off-Road carries the same powertrain seen in other non-hybrid trims — a 2.5-liter inline-four making 203 horsepower and 184 lb-ft of torque, mated to an eight-speed automatic. Toyota designers added to the model’s newly ornery looks with a generous slathering of black exterior trim. Naturally, the slightly more butch RAV4 Adventure was used as a starting point.

So, what makes this model a TRD, you ask? Well, not the Dynamic Torque Vectoring All-Wheel Drive (found on both the RAV4 Limited and Adventure), nor the 8.6 inches of ground clearance (also shared with the Adventure). These attributes help the vehicle’s mission, but it’s in the legs where TRD DNA can be found.

Peer into the wheels wells and you’ll see red coil springs tuned for off-road travel, matched with re-valved twin-tube shocks featuring new internal rebound springs. New bump stops join the fray, helping the crossover avoid getting too wild in those … adventurous … off-pavement moments. Filling the wells are 18×7-inch matte black TRD alloy wheels shod with Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail all-terrain tires. This meaty rubber is Severe Snow Rated and would have come in handy for your author last week.

For conditions where you’ll actually need four-wheel traction, Toyota’s Multi-Terrain Select offers a choice of drive modes: Mud & Sand, Rock & Dirt, and Snow. Hill Start Assist Control, Trailer Sway Control, and Downhill Assist Control completes the package.

Adding to peace of mind is the same Toyota Safety Sense (TSS 2.0) package found on all RAV4s, joined by blind spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, and rear cross-traffic braking. Occupants of this vehicle won’t miss its TRD affiliation — indicators pop up everywhere, from the red trim and stitching to the racing arm’s acronym displayed on the SofTex headrests.

Given the suspension and wheel upgrades added to what’s essentially an Adventure-trimmed RAV4, expect the TRD Off-Road version to leapfrog the Limited in price, which currently sits $600 higher than the Adventure at the top of the pricing ladder. A money-maker since day one, the RAV4 — which sold 427,170 (!) units last year — will continue to generate boffo profits for Toyota, perhaps now even more so.

Official pricing will have to wait until closer to the 2020 model’s on-sale date.

[Images: Toyota, Tim Healey/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 49 comments
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
  • Rochester Always loved that wrap-around cockpit interior. The rest of this car, not so much. Between the two, it was always the mid-90's Cougar that caught my attention.
Next