Can We Interest You in a Cruze? GM Claims Ford/FCA's Loss Is It's Gain

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s gotten to the point where those seen buying a traditional sedan or hatchback are viewed as being unlikely candidates for procreation. After all, you can’t raise a kid in the absence of a vehicle belonging to a segment where “rows” matters more than horsepower or fuel economy. I blame Lee Iacocca for sparking the non-car trend.

Anyway, with Fiat Chrysler out of the small and medium-sized car game, and Ford eager to follow, General Motors feels this new automotive landscape could work to its advantage. Never mind all that doom and gloom (and some very GM-centric rumors).

Speaking to Automotive News, Alan Batey, GM’s North America president, expressed a sentiment heard when Chevrolet brought back the Cruze diesel in numerous configurations as a way of soaking up disgruntled Volkswagen devotees. That sentiment being keep building it, and they will come.

“We have to continue to listen to our customers and react to their needs,” said Batey.

“And right now, there’s a lot of customers that want to buy cars, and they’re big segments. That some of our competitors have decided to exit them, that just creates a bigger opportunity for us.”

The jury’s out on just how many new customers GM might attract from the impending loss of the Fiesta, Focus (in sedan form, anyway), Fusion, and Taurus. With sales of those vehicles dropping markedly in recent years, any bump to GM’s volume could be short-lived. However, it could help extend the lifespan of its passenger car models to some degree.

Earlier this year, rumors arose of the impending demise of the Chevrolet Sonic and Impala, though the smaller of the two did stage a reappearance on regulatory documents for the 2019 model year. Large cars are in the worst shape these days. GM’s Hamtramck assembly plant staged an extended shutdown late last year, and small cars aren’t sitting comfortably, either. Thanks o bulging inventories, downtime became common at the Chevrolet Cruze’s Lordstown, Ohio plant in the past year, with now runs on one shift — down from three when the model debuted.

Batey said he sees no need for further downtime in 2018, but admits things can change in a hurry.

“Based on what I know today, I think we’re in a good position and I don’t see any further downtime against our car plants,” he said. “But, again, if something happens and we see a shift, then we’ll react to it.”

As for the Sonic and Impala’s future, Batey remained tight-lipped.

While Ford sees a future filled with EVs and crossovers, that doesn’t mean no one bought its cars. Sure, it seems the Focus sedan is most often seen performing some sort of fleet duty, but U.S. sales still totalled 158,385 in 2017 (down from 269,272 five years earlier). The Blue Oval also sold 46,249 Fiestas, 209,623 Fusions, and 41,236 Tauruses last year.

As Automotive News points out, GM’s passenger cars sales shrank 18 percent last year, but it also has more available manufacturing capacity compared to Ford. This decreases the need to jettison low-profit models in order to free up room for big-buck SUVs and trucks.

Meanwhile, Hyundai, Toyota, and Honda have no intention of dropping their own traditional passenger cars. Even if Ford owners want to remain in the segment, the market offers plenty of choice. That should be enough to worry GM.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 74 comments
  • Carroll Prescott Carroll Prescott on Jul 05, 2018

    I can assure you that no self-respecting Ford buyer would ever buy a Chevrolet. I'd buy a used Ford before ever considering a product run by the Witch Bara and their taxpayer money thieves.

  • HotPotato HotPotato on Jul 06, 2018

    The first Cruze was an inexpensive car that drove like an expensive car. The way they're equipped in dealer stock, the new Cruze is an expensive car that can't quite justify its price. A bit similar to what happened to the Mazda 3. But no matter how much we all liked the first Cruze based on our test drives, owners didn't: it was one of the two most-traded cars after one year (the other was the Buick Regal, famous for annoying every traditional Buick buyer who didn't realize in time that they were actually buying a flinty German sport tourer with a child-size rear seat). Maybe because the Gen 1 Cruze's base 1.8 liter powerplant was awful, maybe because the Gen 1 Cruze's exterior was styled by the Sears Craftsman screwdriver design team, who knows, but there was presumably something GM was hearing from owners that made them want to make changes. I haven't driven the old and new Cruze back to back. I have driven the old and new Volt back to back, the Volt being a Cruze derived product. The difference is stark: the old one rode much better, due in part no doubt to an isolated front subframe, but the new one has a sporty directness to the handling. Frankly I prefer the old way: if you're not giving me 20% quicker steering too, then don't make the suspension feel like you removed 20% of the travel.

  • EngineerfromBaja_1990 A friend from college had its twin (2003 Cavalier 2dr) which fittingly re-named the Cacalier. No description needed
  • Lorenzo GM is getting out of the car biz, selling only trucks, EVs and the Corvette. They're chasing the bigger margins on lower volume, like the dealer trying to sell a car for $1 million: "I just have to sell one!"
  • SCE to AUX "The closeness of the two sides"56-44 isn't close, if that's what you mean.
  • Jalop1991 expensive repairs??? I've heard that EVs don't require anything that resembles maintenance or repair!So let me get this straight: as EV design and manufacture technology, and as battery technology, improves over time, the early adopters will suffer from having older and ever-rapidly outdated cars that as a result have lower resale value than they thought.And it's the world's obligation to brush their tears away and give them money back as they realize the horrible mistake they made, the mistake made out of some strong desire to signal their virtue, the mistake they could have avoided by--you know--calmly considering the facts up front?Really? It's Tesla's obligation here?If Tesla continued to manufacture the Model 3 (for example) the same way it did originally when the Model 3 was introduced, Tesla would not have been able to lower prices. And they wouldn't have. But they invested heavily in engineering in order to bring prices down--and now the snowflakes are crying in their cereal that the world didn't accommodate their unicorn dreams and wishes and wants and desires.Curse the real world! How dare it interfere with those unicorn wishes!
  • Canam23 I live in southwest France and I am always surprised at how many Teslas I see on the road here. Mind you, I live in a town of 50k people, not a big city so it does seem unusual. On the other hand I also see a lot of PT Cruisers here (with diesel engines) so there's that...
Next