Rare Rides: The 1993 Jaguar XJS, Which Is Actually an XJR… S

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

To celebrate the launch of a brand new model, the people at Jaguar massaged one of their longest-lived models into a special edition.

It’s the XJR you’ve never heard of.

Contrary to what one might assume (I know I did), the first R-branded Jaguar was not the XJR sedan, which debuted in 1994 on the X308 model. The XJR-S started out all the way back in 1988. Jaguar and TWR each owned 50 percent of the new company that built the coupes: JaguarSport. The first XJR-S models had the 5.3-liter H.E. (High Efficiency) V12 engine, which was not all that great. Jaguar swapped the engine for the 6.0-liter V12 in 1989.

That massive six-liter is found under hood here, as well. With a different engine management system, the XJR-S had an increased top speed: 158 miles per hour.

The XJR-S had one final year of availability in 1993, with one final special version sold only in the United States. Jaguar launched its new XJ220 supercar to much fanfare in 1992, prompting the boys in Coventry to create 100 special XJR-S examples.

Just 44 were painted in this Signal Red color, and of those, 22 were convertibles. All XJR-S models had a special body kit and unique wheel design, as well as blacked-out sport bumpers front and rear. Note the grille, devoid of chrome.

Befitting the grand touring luxury image, all XJR-S models had automatic transmissions (four speeds!), and all the walnut veneer the forest could muster.

Dashboards in late XJS models are an assortment of new and old; switches and gauges glued in wherever free space was found. Visible here is the JaguarSport special chromed sill.

This one has been well-maintained, and is still in pristine condition.

Though this was the last XJR-S you could purchase, the standard XJS would soldier on until 1996. For 1997, the XJS bowed out to the XK8, and turned over the Jaguar coupe reins it had held since 1975. For sale in Arizona, this pristine XJR-S is asking $29,900, and has more vintage character than just about any car on sale in 1993.

[Images via seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • SPPPP SPPPP on Jan 03, 2018

    I think a lot of us have heard of it. (Check this website's demographic projections again!)

  • Unimoged Unimoged on Jun 01, 2018

    I cringe when I see the V12. I worked on these cars to pay my way through college. To be exact, the late 70's V12 pre Michael May fireball combustion chamber design that was crafted on these old beasts to improve mileage resulting with the XJS-HE. High Efficiency in relative terms or 9 MPG vs. 13 MPG, Wow. These V12 engines cannot tolerate heat. They drop valve seats at the whiff of coolant temp of 210 F. The timing chain can shear off the cam sprockets and pull them down ripping to shreds the front of the engine and colliding 24 valves with 12 pistons. What a mayhem. The V12 is inherently in-efficient due to frictional losses and heat and a crankshaft that tries to move 12 skinny pistons and 4 ft long camshafts that twist and turn in their aluminum journals. Talking about heat, why would any designer in their right mind put the ignition module in the center of the V to bake at 350 degrees, what's wrong with placing it on the firewall or the side where the beautiful blue and pink relays are kept. I own 4 XJS's . A 1993 FHC and 3 convertibles 94 / 95 / 96. All have the straight six. 2 with AJ6 and 2 AJ16. Simple, straight forward low maintenance engines that can run forever and will tolerate heat, especially since the I-6 have the mechanical cooling fan, with a belt off the crank pulley, running the fan - what a life savior. On the other hand, a V12 owner will sit with sweaty palms watching the temp gauge in traffic and praying to Lucas or Mirelli to work their electric magic and have the temp sensor recognize the pending catastrophe and command a 5 dollar Lucas relay to fire up 2 wheezing electric fans that don't work half of the time. If Jaguar knew what they were doing, they would have offered a 1995 and 1996 XJR-S with the supercharged straight six, available in the same period XJR sedan. That engine would out perform that V12 any day of the week and it will kill it on a hot summer day. That would have been the grand finale for this tortured and polarizing vehicle that the market despised at the beginning and fell in love with it at the end. I guess i will have to build me a real XJR-S. Where the R stands for supeR-charged AJ16.

  • Loser I love these MN12 vehicles. We had a 92 Cougar, my dad had an 89, mom and brother both had T-birds. Wife and I still talk about that car and wish they still made cars like these. It was a very good car for us, 130,000 miles of trouble free and comfortable driving. Sold it to a guy that totaled it a month after purchase. Almost bought a 97 T-bird the 4.6 when I found out it was the last of them but the Cougar was paid for and hard to justify starting payments all over.
  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
Next