Hate Rear Wings? Porsche Now Has a 911 GT3 Just For You - the 911 GT3 Touring Package

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

Plymouth Superbird. Lamborghini Countach. BMW 3.0 CSL. A80 Toyota Supra. Ford Escort Cosworth. Acura Integra Type R. Subaru Impreza WRX STI.

Some cars are indellibly linked with the rear wing that sat atop their trunklids. In some cases, the spoilers weren’t mandatory, but in your mind’s eye, you always envision the WRX STI and Countach with large aerodynamic addenda.

Certainly not every edition of the Porsche 911 is fitted with a rear wing. But from ducktails to speed-sensitive units to gigantic struts supporting flat planes, the Porsche 911’s shape has been connected to additional rear bodywork for decades. The faster the 911, the more likely you were to find an extra piece affixed to the “911” above its engine.

But times, they are a-changin’. And in an attempt to mute the 2018 Porsche 911 GT3 for a mature, purist clientele, a new Touring Package deletes the GT3’s fixed rear wing and forces the fitment of a six-speed manual transmission.

Touring Package cost?

After all, this is Porsche, where the 911 GT3’s front axle lift system costs $2,590; where encasing the dashtop, steering column, sun visors, and transmission tunnel in leather adds $2,680; where the dynamic light system that’s standard on a $37,150 Volkswagen Tiguan adds $780. Adding 27 horsepower to the Porsche 911 Turbo S costs $67,000. Optional wheels on the 911 Turbo S Exclusive Series cost $14,980.

So the 2018 Porsche 911 GT3’s Touring Package? It’s as free as books at the library.

In place of the usual 911 GT3 fixed rear wing, Porsche installs an automatically extending rear spoiler called a Gurney Flap. Badging on the rear lid says GT3 Touring. Rather than Alcantara, the steering wheel, shift lever, doorhandle, and armrests are leather-clad. Stitching switches from grey to black. The manual transmission and 4.0-liter boxer six-cylinder are linked to Porsche Torque Vectoring.

The 2018 Porsche 911 GT3 Touring, Porsche says, won’t be available until November 2017 “at the earliest.” Pricing, including destination, starts at $144,650. The 4.0-liter engine produces 500 horsepower and 339 lb-ft of torque, revving to 8,250 sonorous rpm. Although Porsche says the PDK-equipped GT3 accelerates from nought to 60 four-tenths of a second quicker than the manual car, the seven-speed PDK would add 37 pounds to the GT3. If, that is, it was available with the Touring Package, which it’s not.

U.S. sales of the entire Porsche 911 range are down 9 percent this year, on track for a six-year low. But 911 sales in August 2017, an inordinately car-centric month for Porsche, did rise to a 16-month high.

[Images: Porsche]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 23 comments
  • White Shadow White Shadow on Sep 12, 2017

    Finally!! I don't hate rear wings, but I do hate them when they are overly large and obnoxious. I didn't think we'd ever see the day that you could get a GT3 without the stupidly big wing on the back.

  • Voyager Voyager on Sep 13, 2017

    "Touring package"... Perhaps someone should tell those Germans that a car that practically invites you to behave like a hooligan doing the twisties is something different than dad leisurely coasting down the highway.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mermilio Mermilio on Sep 13, 2017

      If I'm spending $144 THOUSAND for a car, I'll hoon however I damn well please.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next