2018 Subaru Outback Barely Messes With a Good Thing

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s just slightly easier to notice the changes made to Subaru’s 2018 Outback compared to, say, next year’s radically refreshed Mitsubishi Outlander Sport.

Though subtle, the Outback’s 2018 styling tweaks brings the all-wheel-drive wagon’s design more in line with its corporate siblings, each of which tries to emulate the brand’s endless parade of Viziv concepts. If you were hoping for a power boost from the vehicle’s stalwart 2.5-liter flat-four, well, dream on.

For its mid-cycle refresh, the Outback maintains its present level of matte body cladding, the acreage of which shrank heavily after the end of the GM Plastic Fantastic era.

Sharp eyebrows creased into the front fascia now surround the Outback’s fog lights. The lower grille opening grows wider, while the headlights adopt C-shaped wraparound running lights. A single chrome crossbar now centers the badge in the upper grille.

Besides this, the only other exterior changes you might notice are new wheel designs, reshaped side mirrors and, if it’s after dark, available steering-sensitive headlights. Limited and Touring models now sport a high-beam assist feature. This automatic system prevents the drivers of other vehicles from being blinded by your headlight negligence, making the world a less aggravating place.

Both engines — the 2.5-liter four and 3.6-liter flat-six — carry over into 2018 with no changes in output. To its credit, Subaru has adjusted the base engine’s timing to reduce drivetrain noise during acceleration.

You might, however, notice a change in the Outback’s transmission. While the Lineartronic continuously variable transmission returns, it does so with a retuned electronic control unit. The automaker claims the changes makes the gearbox (rubber band box?) smoother and more responsive, while a quieter short-pitch chain should help reduce “CVT drone.” Let’s hope the retune also reduces the lag its previous transmission exhibited after shifting.

Other ride-quality areas seeing subtle finessing include the power steering system, brake system and suspension dampers. For a quieter cabin, side window glass grows in thickness.

Inside, the Outback sprouts a redesigned console, higher-quality materials, new colors, and an available 8-inch Starlink multimedia touchscreen. That’s 1-inch wider than last year’s. Base systems make do with a 6.5-inch screen, up by three-tenths of an inch over 2017.

Subaru promises an improved voice recognition system on next year’s model, assisted by two microphones and technology borrowed from the maker of Dragon software. Using Apple Siri or OK Google voice commands should become easier. While the list of minor tech improvements is a long one, some notables include the addition of steering-sensitive guidance lines displayed on the media screen while the vehicle is backing up, as well as a lane-keeping system that now kicks in above 37 miles per hour.

Pricing remains a mystery for now. As the release date draws near, expect any changes to be — like the Outback’s styling — evolutionary.

[Images: Subaru of America]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Ldl20 Ldl20 on Apr 07, 2017

    2015 2.5i Limited owner here. This refresh is what I expected, but I think Subaru is missing on the boat on not at least offering an XT package with this car. Offer unique colors (Polestar blue, for example), tighten up the suspension a bit, and drop in the WRX motor. My car has been great, but the 2.5, especially for the 1st 10-15 minutes on a cold morning below 35, is painfully loud and slow.; I feel like I'm hurting the damn thing by pressing the accelerator!

  • Wintermutt Wintermutt on Dec 01, 2017

    wife bought a 2018 6 cylinder touring with all the options. so far so good! note that consumer reports under "problems" states "none" for this vehicle. it is the only vehicle in the entire 2018 issue with "none" in that column. i hope they are right on this one. we paid out the door about 40K.

  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
  • Macca This one definitely brings back memories - my dad was a Ford-guy through the '80s and into the '90s, and my family had two MN12 vehicles, a '93 Thunderbird LX (maroon over gray) purchased for my mom around 1995 and an '89 Cougar LS (white over red velour, digital dash) for my brother's second car acquired a year or so later. The Essex V6's 140 hp was wholly inadequate for the ~3,600 lb car, but the look of the T-Bird seemed fairly exotic at the time in a small Midwest town. This was of course pre-modern internet days and we had no idea of the Essex head gasket woes held in store for both cars.The first to grenade was my bro's Cougar, circa 1997. My dad found a crate 3.8L and a local mechanic replaced it - though the new engine never felt quite right (rough idle). I remember expecting something miraculous from the new engine and then realizing that it was substandard even when new. Shortly thereafter my dad replaced the Thunderbird for my mom and took the Cougar for a new highway commute, giving my brother the Thunderbird. Not long after, the T-Bird's 3.8L V6 also suffered from head gasket failure which spelled its demise again under my brother's ownership. The stately Cougar was sold to a family member and it suffered the same head gasket fate with about 60,000 miles on the new engine.Combine this with multiple first-gen Taurus transmission issues and a lemon '86 Aerostar and my dad's brand loyalty came to an end in the late '90s with his purchase of a fourth-gen Maxima. I saw a mid-90s Thunderbird the other day for the first time in ages and it's still a fairly handsome design. Shame the mechanicals were such a letdown.
  • FreedMike It's a little rough...😄
  • Rochester Always loved that wrap-around cockpit interior. The rest of this car, not so much. Between the two, it was always the mid-90's Cougar that caught my attention.
Next