Chevrolet Corvette May Get Active Aerodynamics System, Patents Reveal

Sam McEachern
by Sam McEachern

General Motors has filed a patent application for an innovative active aerodynamics system that may find its way into forthcoming C7 Corvette variant.

The application is for a “vehicle ride-height determination,” system that will adjust the vehicle’s active aerodynamic components “based on changes to the body relative to the center of the wheels.” It will also account for tire deflection, adjusting the active aero based on the load applied to the tires.

The controller is programmed with a look-up table establishing a correlation between the detected height of the vehicle body relative to the road wheel and the deflection of the tire, and wherein the controller is configured to determine the deflection of the tire using the look-up table.

A variety of active aero pieces are outlined in the patent drawings, including a front splitter, hood vents, a rear wing and grille shutters. It’s not clear if all these will be used in the potential production application of the system, or if GM is simply covering the bases with the patent and outlining every applicable component.

GM’s system differs from regular active aero in that it will attempt to compensate for any performance left on the table by the suspension becoming upset or the tires receiving too much load. Many other active aero systems will only adjust the position of the wings and shutters based on the speed of the vehicle or based on the application of the throttle and brake, but this version is much more sophisticated.

A pair of C7 Corvette ZR1 prototypes were recently filmed pounding around Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, but we couldn’t spot any active aero pieces upon viewing the video. It’s possible Chevy is playing its cards close to its chest and purposely hiding the active aero system on the ZR1, or perhaps we won’t see it in a production application for quite some time. GM sure isn’t letting any more info slip out, with head of communications for Chevy performance cars Ron Kiino telling GMInsideNews there’s “no comment” from the automaker at this time.

Sam McEachern
Sam McEachern

More by Sam McEachern

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 7 comments
  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Mar 25, 2017

    Amazing technology that brings amazing performance on the track, but for road use we are long past the point of relevance. How many people take their Vette (or other performance car) past .7g, do the 0-60 run in less than 7-8 seconds, or exceed 100 mph on the street? I'm guessing virtually none, and Vettes could pull those numbers or better 60 years ago on skinny tires, zero aero aids, and $4,000 sticker prices.

    • Tosh Tosh on Mar 26, 2017

      $4000 in 1957 has the same buying power as $35000 today in 2017.

  • El scotto El scotto on Mar 26, 2017

    This technology will be exclusive to the Corvette for the 1st 5-6 years. In year 6 this technology will appear on the Camaro with the Corvette engine and that Camaro will cost as much a base Corvette. None of this technology will appear anywhere but on Corvettes and the one special Camaro. It won't appear on, or in, GM products besides these two vehicles. Meanwhile, they'll do fist bumps in Bowling Green and brag about how they make "world class" products. GM shouldn't keep their best technology for the Corvette, they should share as much as possible throughout the whole company.

    • Low_compression Low_compression on Mar 27, 2017

      Hey, it took GM 55+ years to share the fully independent suspension with the Camaro!

  • Loser I love these MN12 vehicles. We had a 92 Cougar, my dad had an 89, mom and brother both had T-birds. Wife and I still talk about that car and wish they still made cars like these. It was a very good car for us, 130,000 miles of trouble free and comfortable driving. Sold it to a guy that totaled it a month after purchase. Almost bought a 97 T-bird the 4.6 when I found out it was the last of them but the Cougar was paid for and hard to justify starting payments all over.
  • CoastieLenn I would do dirrrrrrty things for a pristine 95-96 Thunderbird SC.
  • Whynotaztec Like any other lease offer it makes sense to compare it to a purchase and see where you end up. The math isn’t all that hard and sometimes a lease can make sense, sometimes it can’t. the tough part with EVs now is where is the residual or trade in value going to be in 3 years?
  • Rick T. "If your driving conditions include near-freezing temps for a few months of the year, seek out a set of all-seasons. But if sunshine is frequent and the spectre of 60F weather strikes fear into the hearts of your neighbourhood, all-seasons could be a great choice." So all-seasons it is, apparently!
  • 1995 SC Should anyone here get a wild hair and buy this I have the 500 dollar tool you need to bleed the rear brakes if you have to crack open the ABS. Given the state you will. I love these cars (obviously) but trust me, as an owner you will be miles ahead to shell out for one that was maintained. But properly sorted these things will devour highway miles and that 4.6 will run forever and should be way less of a diva than my blown 3.8 equipped one. (and forget the NA 3.8...140HP was no match for this car).As an aside, if you drive this you will instantly realize how ergonomically bad modern cars are.These wheels look like the 17's you could get on a Fox Body Cobra R. I've always had it in the back of my mind to get a set in the right bolt pattern so I could upgrade the brakes but I just don't want to mess up the ride. If that was too much to read, from someone intamately familiar with MN-12's, skip this one. The ground effects alone make it worth a pass. They are not esecially easy to work on either.
Next