BREAKING: Audi Admits to Defeat Device, Details Fix For 3-liter Diesel Engines

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Audi, a brand within Volkswagen Group that markets the majority of 3-liter diesel engines sold by the group in the United States, released a statement Monday detailing how it plans to fix vehicles that use a defeat device. The automaker also stated that three separate Auxiliary Emissions Control Devices — not just one — are used in 2009 and later 3-liter diesels used by Audi, Volkswagen (Touareg) and Porsche (Cayenne).

AECDs for those engines will “be revised, documented and submitted for approval,” Audi said in the statement.

Of the three AECDs, the EPA questioned the legality of a temperature conditioning procedure of the exhaust-gas cleaning system.

“One of (the AECDs) is regarded as a defeat device according to applicable US law. Specifically, this is the software for the temperature conditioning of the exhaust-gas cleaning system,” Audi said in a statement.

“The other two AECDs are for the avoidance of deposits on the Ad-Blue metering valve and of HC poisoning of the SCR catalyst with unburnt hydrocarbons,” according to Audi.

None of the AECDs specified by the automaker Monday were adequately documented or declared by Audi in its application for U.S. approval.

The software responsible for the AECDs will be updated and the appropriate documentation submitted to the EPA for approval. Audi did not specify how that software would be updated, though the removal of the illegal temperature conditioning program is likely while the other AECDs could remain.

Audi expects the fixes to cost “in the mid-double-digit millions of euros.”

The stop sale of affected models will continue until further notice. Those models include the Audi A6, A7, A8, Q5 and Q7 from model years 2009 and later, the Volkswagen Touareg from model year 2009 and later, and the Porsche Cayenne from model year 2013 and later. Roughly 85,000 cars are affected, according to Reuters.

The diesel emissions scandal began on September 18 when 2-liter Clean Diesel models were found to emit more than 40 times the allowable level of NOx. About 482,000 cars were included in the initial notice by the EPA.

Later, Volkswagen, Audi and Porsche were given a Notice of Violation on November 2 regarding the temperature control device employed by the 3-liter diesel. Volkswagen initially asserted that the AECD in question was legal, even though it was undeclared.

On Friday, Volkswagen revealed the same defeat device was used on all 3-liter diesels from the model year 2009 and later after the EPA had initially only targeted a small number of later model year vehicles.

A fix or fixes for smaller 2-liter diesels were not detailed in the statement.

Click here to follow our ongoing coverage of the Volkswagen diesel emissions scandal.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next