Nissan Prices 2024 Rogue, Only Modest Hikes Appear

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Just about everything is more expensive these days. Why, just last week, our Managing Editor was complaining about his trip to buy methylated spirits and a hammer drill as part of his planned New Year’s Eve festivities*. This is why it’s all the more remarkable when automakers essentially hold the line on pricing models for a new model year – especially when it is one of their best sellers.


Nissan didn’t even try to pull a sneaky on ya and slide a price hike into the fine print. There is no change to destination and handling for the 2024 Rogue, a line item which remains at $1,365 and is not included in the prices listed here.


Starting in the basement, S trims with front-wheel drive now command $28,320 which is $410 dearer than last year. The rungs on the ladder which do the most volume in Nissan showrooms, the SV and SL, are now priced at $30,010 and $35,170 respectively. Those are increases of $410 (is there an echo in here?) and $1,110. The latter could be seen as a quick profit boost for the company, one which sadly may not be outrageously obvious to shoppers comparing biweekly payment spread over a 84-month term. Platinum front-drivers are now $38,600 which also represents a $1,110 jump.


As with last year, adding all-wheel drive is a $1,500 proposition on any trim. Other various and sundry add-ons include a Premium Package on SV, SL, and Platinum models. Despite bearing the same moniker across the board, this group could add the likes of a glass roof and heated seats or a better sound system and helpful driving aids depending on selected trim. It seems the price for these packages has actually dropped a bit in 2024, potentially offsetting some of the MSRP hike.

Powertrains remain unchanged, showing up as a 1.5L three-cylinder turbo good for 201 horsepower and 225 lb-ft of torque. The latter doesn’t come online until 2,800 rpm, so make sure you test drive this thing on your routes around town to confirm you’re fine with its responsiveness before signing the note. The blasted CVT Xtronic remains.


As the brand’s bread and butter, look for the 2024 Rogue in dealerships immediatement.


*Ed. note -- I think Mr. Guy confused his own festivities with mine.


[Image: Nissan]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 38 comments
  • SCE to AUX Here's a crazy thought - what if China decides to fully underwrite the 102.5% tariff?
  • 3-On-The-Tree They are hard to get in and out of. I also like the fact that they are still easy to work on with the old school push rod V8. My son’s 2016 Mustang GT exhaust came loose up in Tuscon so I put a harbor freight floor jack, two jack stands, tool box and two 2x4 in the back of the vette. So agreed it has decent room in the back for a sports car.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh so what?? .. 7.5 billion is not even in the same hemisphere as the utterly stupid waste of money on semiconductor fabs to the tune of more than 100 billion for FABS that CANNOT COMPETE in a global economy and CANNOT MAKE THE US Independent from China or RUSSIA. we REQUIRE China for cpu grade silicon and RUSSIA/Ukraine for manufacturing NEON gas for cpus and gpus and other silicon based processors for cars, tvs, phones, cable boxes ETC... so even if we spend trillion $ .. we STILL have to ask china permission to buy the cpu grade silicon needed and then buy neon gas to process the wafers.. but we keep tossing intel/Taiwan tens of billions at a time like a bunch of idiots.Google > "mining-and-refining-pure-silicon-and-the-incredible-effort-it-takes-to-get-there" Google > "silicon production by country statista" Google > "low-on-gas-ukraine-invasion-chokes-supply-of-neon-needed-for-chipmaking"
  • ToolGuy Clearly many of you have not been listening to the podcast.
  • 1995 SC This seems a bit tonedeaf.
Next