Stellantis Limiting Availability of Gasoline Models by State Emission Rules

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Stellantis is reportedly no longer allocating gasoline-only vehicles to the fourteen states with leadership that has agreed to adhere to the emission standards set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). While the rules exceed federal standards, they’ve been embraced by coastal regions and beginning to influence how the industry does business. 

For Stellantis brands (e.g. Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Ram, etc.) this means dealer allocation will prioritize powertrains based on how restrictive the local emissions standards happen to be.


According to Automotive News, Stellantis has already stopped delivering internal combustion models to dealerships located in CARB states unless customers have ordered them special. Meanwhile, dealerships situated in non-CARB states can no longer get models like the Wrangler 4xe and other plug-ins without a customer order.


From Automotive News:


Stellantis began changing allocations for the two groups of states about two months ago. The automaker told dealers in April that the CARB states are enforcing tougher greenhouse gas standards retroactively to the 2021 model year. Those standards are separate from the zero-emission sales minimums that begin in 2026.
About 36 percent of the U.S. population lives in the 14 CARB states, according to 2023 Census Bureau estimates. Four additional states are adopting the California standards for future model years.
Dealers in the CARB states worry they'll be at a disadvantage if consumers start crossing state lines to buy gasoline vehicles from another store's inventory rather than wait for a factory order. Some are working to trade for gasoline vehicles with stores in adjacent states.
"I think many of us expected when the CARB rules actually kick in in 2026 in a meaningful way that we'd have some allocation challenges," said Brian Maas, president of the California New Car Dealers Association. "The fact that it's happening [with Stellantis] in the middle of 2023 is a bit of a surprise. ... People are going to go to Reno and Vegas and Phoenix to get ICE Wranglers, if that's what they want."


While the government is playing a significant role here, there’s nothing formally prohibiting Stellantis from conducting business as usual. Californian rules requiring automakers to sell a certain percentage of zero-emission vehicles weren’t supposed to come into play until 2026 and some of the states backing the CARB proposals don’t have any firm backing behind the scheme. Voters don’t typically have a say in these sorts of regulations beyond electing the person that signs off. Even the California Air Resources Board itself is composed primarily of members that are appointed by the state’s governor, who then make decisions about how to regulate automobiles. 


Why would Stellantis bother complying if it didn’t have to? Don’t traditional combustion stales still outpace plug-in volumes by a rather wide margin? What’s to be gained here?


Speculatively speaking, there’s money to be made if customers have to special order the vehicles they want. All of the above makes a handy excuse for lower-than-average allocations. It may likewise help dealers push plug-in vehicles that might not be getting the right kind of love in other states and will undoubtedly provide a wealth of useful marketing data before certain regulations become mandatory. 


Based on what we’ve seen over the past several years, EV fans seem willing to wait on the model they desire. But someone just seeking reliable transportation is less likely to do so and will frequently opt for something inexpensive that’s already on the lot. If you’re living in a CARB-aligned state, that model is now more likely to feature some form of electrification and presumably retail for more than what’s waiting for your peers in neighboring regions. 


The states that currently follow emissions guidelines set by the California Air Resources Board are Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington. 


Those areas will no longer be issued combustion-only trims for models that offer a hybrid or all-electric alternative. Expect to see surging Jeep 4xe sales. Though vehicles that have no EV equivalent will continue being sold in states that have adopted Californian rules without special order — for now.


[Images: Stellantis]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 60 comments
  • BEPLA BEPLA on Jun 22, 2023

    Oh please - you guys and your handwringing….

    It’s no different than other manufacturers such as Mercedes, Volvo, VW, Toyota, GM and others deciding to only bring certain models and engines to the US market, or even just certain states.

    Even most recently, if you wanted a Volvo V90 wagon, you needed to special-order it.

    Certain Kias were only offered in coastal states.

    You can’t walk into the Ford Dealer in Santa Monica or Lisbon and expect to see a fleet of SuperDuty trucks and F150s awaiting your choosing.

    Business isn’t about offering all choices to everyone everywhere.



  • Sabkharaab554 Sabkharaab554 on Jun 28, 2023

    I can't decide if this is a hit on Chrysler in favor if the other "domestic" brands who willingly kowtowed but perhaps its as simple as another pincer of the overall strategy controlled demolition of the auto industry.

    pikashow

    ppsspp emulator


  • Teleedle It would seem that if the Chinese made cars and trucks are ready to compete on the world market that they should be able to compete without the need for government help through subsidies. That's never going to happen with the mindset of their leadership. The rate at which they've transferred the ability to copy to the rate of their abilities to innovate isn't really astounding, but it is truly indicative of their inherent abilities to see through problems and overcome without a lot of fuss. They just have a different way that seems to continually baffle the Western mind. It only goes back a few thousand years. The rest of the world just has to catch up... Without tariffs, three Seagulls could be bought for the price of one loaded Toyota Corolla. I would settle for a nice small pickup truck that can get 30-35 mpg, if the Chinese want to build something with real durability and value. I'm sure they can do that for about $10-12k US, too, dumping them all the way to the bank. Neither Trump or Biden or Bugbrain want that, though. Restrictive 'targeted' tariff ideas indicate that they all want protectionism and the Chicken Tax to continue. The price of living in freedum in the non compete world... and the hallmark of one upmanship by the political class towards more and more expensive transportation related needs. All costs are ALWAYS passed onto the end consumer. Tariffs are the burden of the extra cost. Tariffs are punitive, remember... as intended. The political class is still living off the backs of their constituents throughout the world... same as it ever was.
  • Theflyersfan One day, some of these sellers will come to the realization that cars are not houses and putting expensive upgrades into one doesn't equal a higher selling price down the road. $29,000? The only Challenger that has a chance of value down the road, and only with low miles, is the Hellcat.
  • SaulTigh The Cyclone engine was really powerful, but with a fatal flaw. Ask me how I know.
  • Tassos You can answer your own question for yourself, Tim, if you ask instead"Have Japanese (or Korean) Automakers Eaten Everyone's Lunch"?I am sure you can answer it without my help.
  • Tassos WHile this IS a legitimate used car, unlike the vast majority of Tim's obsolete 30 and 40 year old pieces of junk, the price is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS. It is not even a Hellcat. WHat are you paying for? The low miles? I wish it had DOUBLE the miles, which would guarantee it was regularly driven AND well maintained these 10 years, and they were easy highway miles, not damaging stop-go city miles!!!
Next