Ford Rumored to Dump Parking Assist Moving Forward
Ford is said to be in early stages of dumping parking assistance features on future models because drivers aren’t using the feature enough. Active Park Assist has been around for over a decade at this point. However, the computer-guided parallel parking feature is supposedly not going to be appearing in future models as a way to help the automaker cut production costs.
In a conference call heard by CarBuzz, Ford COO Kumar Galhotra said the parallel parking feature doesn’t see a lot of use and could likely be eliminated without creating an uproar while saving Blue Oval an estimated $10 million per year.
“So one example is an auto-park feature that lets the customer parallel park automatically. Very, very few people are using it, so we can remove that feature. It’s about $60 per vehicle,” he said.
From CarBuzz:
The parallel parking assistance feature is part of Ford's Active Park Assist suite of driver-assistance tech. Introduced in 2009, it was among the first commercially available systems of its kind (Toyota being the first a few years prior), with the aim to alleviate the "stress" from the so-called "challenging" parking procedure.
Since then, several Ford vehicles received the feature, even the entry-level ones. Today, almost every brand-new vehicle with driver-assist features offers active parallel parking assistance.
However, the feature isn't exactly something that customers use extensively, as Galhotra remarked. The company discovered this by using connected vehicle data from its customers.
The Active Park Assist, now in version 2.0, is still being offered to Ford vehicles today as part of Ford's Co-Pilot360 — an SAE Level 2 autonomous driving technology. The F-150 Lightning and the newly launched facelifted Explorer, among other Ford vehicles, currently include the feature, but perhaps not for much longer.
As someone who parks vehicles on the regular, your author can comfortably say that most parking assistance features don’t tend to see a lot of use beyond that initial curiosity. The systems either work flawlessly or muck things up so badly that you vow to never use them again. The only real exception are rear-view cameras, which are nice to have considering how high beltlines have impacted the outward visibility of modern automobiles. While you should always check your surroundings manually to ensure safety, having a little camera that addresses the blind spot directly behind the vehicle is nice.
Meanwhile, features like Ford’s Active Park Assist tend to be a little slower than slotting the vehicle in the space yourself. It’s certainly impressive to see the car managing the task itself. But the action is always a little unsettling, requiring operators to hold their foot over the brake as the car does its thing, and is often slower than having a competent driver just park the vehicle without any automated help. Still, there will definitely be some people who will miss the feature once it’s gone.
[Image: Ford Motor Co.]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 3-On-The-Tree Tassos, I’m have several different responses yeti your question.[list=1][*] I didn’t buy the corvette for the sole purpose of highway travail, I got it because my dad had a 57 Corvette with 2 four barrel carbs and. 283 V8. I wanted a corvette and a friend who has a custom car performance shop said to get the newest one you could afford.[/*][*]. Letting a car sit is the worst thing for it so it was my daily driver when I was still in the army 30 miles to the base round trip, 160 miles to Tucson form my doctors appointments and VA stuff. My POS 2014 F150 was constantly in the shop for both turbos, two rear main seals, timing chain, transmission. So I was in the process of selling that.[/*][*]But the most important point is that everyone has an opinion and it doesn’t matter what car a person buys or what they use it for.[/*][/list=1]
- EBFlex About time the corpse does something right.I wonder where he got the idea....
- Ajla And in case anyone was interested, yes this tariff does also apply to Polestars, Lincolns, Teslas, Buicks, etc.
- SCE to AUX NPR had an interesting piece on this situation just yesterday, and it turns out that Biden has actually expanded the Trump China tariffs rather than roll them back.However, rather than using the usual shotgun approach employed by past Presidents, Biden's tariff hikes are directed at green/clean energy items which also include non-automotive things such as solar panels.So it looks like the IRA's selective anti-China incentives are part of a larger green agenda, but the plan could backfire if consumers simply choose non-green products instead.Not to mention that it takes gobs of tax money to create the jobs our leaders promise. One calculation put the cost of each new US job created in the solar panel industry at $800k (grain of salt here).Historically, tariffs have been applied after elections, as a reward to those who supported the winning candidate. Of course, this one is happening before the election. Both have political timing, but their economic benefit is doubtful at best, usually injuring the nation who imposes the tariffs.The EU is also getting in on the act, so we could be facing an economic world war over the sourcing of green products. Sadly, if China wasn't an oppressive communist state, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
- BlackEldo My initial reaction to the interior was "well, they have to leave something on the table to sell the equivalent-sized Lexus." Then I saw the MSRP...
Comments
Join the conversation
Apologies for linking to a 'short' - if you do watch it, watch it until the end. 😉
"...However, the feature isn't exactly something that customers use extensively, as Galhotra remarked. The company discovered this by using connected vehicle data from its customers..."
THIS is what we should be concerned about...