Mercedes-Benz is in Dutch With China's Chery Over Its EQ Brand Name

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

China’s Chery Automobile Company has filed a formal complaint against Daimler AG over is usage of “EQ” as designation for an upcoming lineup of Mercedes-Benz electric cars. That’s bad news for Benz, as China possesses the world’s largest EV marketplace and Daimler has already begun promoting its future electric lineup using the name.

The German automaker said last year that it would begin producing EQ models in Europe before the end of the decade, with the global sub-brand sold in both eastern and western markets. Unfortunately, Chery already has a fully electric minicar named the eQ that was launched in China in November of 2014. The car is based on the current Chery QQ, which was the centerpiece of a 2005 lawsuit from General Motors following claims that its design was stolen from the Daewoo Matiz and Chevrolet Spark.

A Chery spokeswoman told Reuters on Thursday that the automaker has filed a complaint with the Trademark Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and hopes to prohibit Mercedes from using the name in China.

“If it entered the Chinese market, it would impact our trademark rights,” the Chery spokeswoman said. “Mercedes Benz EQ and our [eQ] are extremely similar. Their product is also an electric car.”

Mercedes’ released a written response later that same day stating that Daimler had filed all the applicable trademark applications regarding the EQ name with the relevant authorities — but declined to elaborate further.

China purchases more electric cars than the rest of the world combined, and there are loads of government initiatives for automakers and consumers to shift toward EVs in order to reduce air pollution. While a ruling in favor of Chery might not alter the EQ branding in the west, it would still be a massive hindrance to Mercedes’ marketing efforts in Asia and force it to reevaluate its overall approach.

[Image: Mercedes-Benz]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • Wantahertzdonut Tony grew tired of fixing this one, again.
  • Lorenzo The only thing that should be sustainable for a business is making and selling products at a profit. People who wear crocs, eat gluten-free bagels, and own crystals won't like it, but it's the only long-term sustainability there is.
  • Lorenzo I don't celebrate the beginning of Summer until the Solstice on June 20 this year. I used to go to England and dance naked around Stonehenge with the druids, but the "authorities" put the kibosh on that. Now I just bake potatoes wrapped in foil on my car's engine block, in the driveway.
  • Cprescott Best part of this website is the history series.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Can’t make it up: California Dems are now complaining that the state is losing billions of dollars because of how many people have switched to electric vehicles, and so the state is no longer collecting enough gas taxes, which they claim is used to fixed the roads, bridges, infrastructure, etc. So California will now be rolling out an insane plan to charge California drivers $.30 per mile. This is actually happening. So if you have a 20 mile commute both to and from work, that would cost you $12 a day. So Californians are now being punished for switching over to EVs. And this is just the beginning, remember, Newsom wants to be 100% EV by 2035. Imagine what they’ll be charging by then? Keep voting them in.
Next