Ace of Base: 2017 Honda Accord Coupe LX-S

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

When planning the ninth-generation Accord, Honda knew it pushed the boundaries of size and good taste a little too far. The eighth-generation Accord became a caricature of its former self, scampering as it did into full-size territory by swelling to 195 inches in length.

This particular Ace of Base candidate reminds me of Mitsubishi. Why, you might ask? Well …

Honda affords Accord Coupe buyers a single $0 hue not found on the grayscale; Still Night sounds like it should be a shade of black, but it’s a very nice shade of deep blue. This misdirection no doubt causes headaches for harried sales managers who are furtively filling out inventory order forms while swilling a cup of rancid coffee from the half-broken machine in the service department. It’s at this juncture that Mitsubishi comes into play.

Long-time TTAC readers may recall my sojourn into auto sales, holding court about a dozen or so years ago at the smaller of two Ford stores in my former town. What I haven’t mentioned (I’m not even sure our managing ed. knows about this) is, for a short time prior to my tenure at Ford, I was one of two salesmen at a brand new Mitsubishi store, circa 2003.

Yes, dear reader, I joyfully convinced many people to sign five- and six-year notes on Diamond-Star wheels.

One customer brokered a deal for a special-order Eclipse GT, replete with its 3.0-liter V6 engine and all the toys. It would take weeks for it to arrive at our far-flung dealership, which was physically closer to Ireland than to the Mitsubishi plant in Normal, Illinois. Unbeknownst to all, the hapless sales manager, when placing the order, selected Steel Blue Pearl instead of Torch Steel Blue Pearl. Go ahead, click on the link to see the vast gulf between the two colors. I’ll wait.

I know, right? It beggars belief that the marketing mavens at Mitsubishi would stick two extremely similar names on two wholly different colors.

When the Eclipse finally arrived on the back of a car carrier, the sales manager’s jaw dropped like a barometer on a stormy Sunday. The customer was understandably outraged, yet inexplicably re-ordered his Eclipse in the proper shade, standing over the sales manager’s shoulder while he punched in the data (and trust me, he was punching stuff by this time). This left us with an Eclipse featuring a sky-high MSRP draped in a weird color, completely unsaleable, essentially welded to the showroom floor for the rest of its mechanical life. This, naturally, was the salesman’s problem.

But I digress. Honda has managed to stuff its base model Accord Coupe with content. A steering wheel that adjusts for reach and rake, snazzy 17-inch alloys, and marriage-saving dual climate control are all along for the ride. Six airbags keep all hands safe in the event of a vehicular calamity.

Base-model shoppers again find themselves benefitting from economies of scale, as it’s no doubt cheaper for the good folks at Honda to equip every Accord Coupe with power options and cruise control and not design and manufacture distinct door cards and steering wheels for different models. The sound system is good, packed as it is with six speakers and Bluetooth. Mercifully, Honda’s current predilection with maddeningly invisible-to-the-touch sliders for volume control does not appear here.

At a price of $24,025, shoppers can expect to find a tasty six-speed manual transmission and the well liked but unfortunately named Earth Dreams inline-four making a respectable 185 horsepower. Skip the optional CVT — it’s an $850 ticket to Mediocrity, with overnight stops in Boringtown and NoFunsVille.

Everyone knows the coupe is available with a silky V6, but the larger gas-burner adds a lot of heft, most of it placed squarely over the front wheels. A full 63 percent of the V6 model’s 3,500 pounds bears down on the two front rollers, while the four-cylinder six-speed manual weighs in at under 3,200 pounds with a better 60/40 weight distribution. The Earth Dreams four-pot swills regular fuel at an EPA measured rate of 32 miles per gallon on the highway.

Ninety-five cubic feet of passenger volume ensures there’s plenty of room up front for two Large Persons and enough space in the back for three people to sit and complain. Drivers who are long of beam will appreciate the lack of sunroof in the LX-S, freeing up two inches of headroom and adding two cubic feet of passenger volume compared to its glass-topped EX and Touring brethren. Confounding, the LX-S has a bigger trunk (by nearly a third of a cubic foot) than its better-equipped brothers. Use the extra space to store all the dollar bills you saved by buying the base model.

Color names be damned, a manual shift, four-cylinder Accord Coupe meets my criteria for Ace of Base. It should meet yours, too.

Not every vehicle at the Mr. Noodles end of the price spectrum has aced it. The ones which have? They help make our automotive landscape a lot better. Naturally, feel free to roast our selection and let us know if there are other models you’d like included in this series.

The model above is shown with American options and is priced in Freedom Dollars.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 64 comments
  • 357 357 on Oct 14, 2016

    I'll plug the Mini Cooper for the next installment of Ace of Base. The turbo 3/stick shift combo is unequivocally the powerplant to have. The base seats are arguably better in a car of such a narrow width than the sport units (albeit the lack of a cloth option on the base seats is lamentable). The sunroof option is equally inappropriate in a car of this width (the left and right edges of the glass are centered over the respective seats meaning one eyeball sees sky and the other headliner when you look upwards). The suspension is already stiff enough and the wheelbase short enough that punishing yourself with low-profile tires makes zero sense, and its just delightfully retro to have a car running around on 175s in today's world.

  • Chiefmonkey Chiefmonkey on Oct 14, 2016

    This is cheaper than the Accord Coupe, and has the same stylish wheels: https://img123.s3.amazonaws.com/2015/06/03/fd/d3d9c0969fe0a160_e9d5690b1b567b.jpg

  • ToolGuy Helium-3, baby!
  • Roman Our 1999 Pontiac Sunfire Gt is still running without any issues. 25 years and counting.
  • 28-Cars-Later I thought today's young people weren't even getting licenses to drive, so which is it?
  • 28-Cars-Later Either last year or the year before I was discussing how The Dytopia™'s BEV schemes do not scale simply because the existing grid cannot generate enough power to replace ICE and the gigantic investment necessary in the grid was not forthcoming (Zelensky needed another house in Miami Beach after all you b!gots). So it struck me the only path to sort of do it is natural gas which became abundantly cheap 15 years ago because of fracking. Fast forward to more recently and surprise surprise we're attacking civilian use of natural gas out of nowhere for very little benefit. I couldn't find any good data to break down natural gas consumption between industrial use and civilian use, but spitballing I'd say the two largest chunks would be power generation and heating followed by small slices for other industrial use and home appliances- the latter probably being 5% or less (on my own gas bill its about 3-10% for the non furnace gas use depending on laundry loads). Some argued The Dystopia wanted to take away any energy freedom the proles have outside of electricity which they control on their whims, but I'm thinking that small number is optimal for them to take back because it doesn't force any additional infrastructure cost to gain (i.e. the low hanging fruit). As more power plants are spun up I expect a slow consolidation away from civilian nat gas because ManBearPig or whatever other fairy tale, but its really to power the gilded electronic cage they are constructing out of this once great nation. Seriously, break this down:Self lubricating Diesel engine with conventional OTS components, built for more than a ten year lifespan and 1m or more miles of use which can quickly be refueled at hundreds of locations (or fuel be brought to them). Pure BEV with some large amount of rare earths with a ten (?) year lifespan and perhaps 1m miles use but which has an avg daily downtime of 2 hours (?) to refuel and must be powered by a limited number of natural gas stations at static points (theoretically you could put a diesel fuel depot anywhere must faster and refill it with trucks). Other than ManBearPig fiction, your only savings in emissions is whatever the DEF isn't catching now (which is up to 90% in civilian diesel use per JLR) minus whatever emissions sins the nat gas burning creates. Think about how ridiculous all of this is to save 10-20% of emissions of only heavy trucks (BEV ships aren't ever going to be a thing) and you still have to frack like mad to have the natural gas to do it which would create the diesel in the first place. What is the nonsense?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X The only vehicle from Chi-nah I'd be interested in would be a LR Defender or MB G-Wagon knock off with Chinese uniqueness.
Next